• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

hicks on transfer budget.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skullflower

Part of the Furniture
Member
Tom Hicks promises big summer splash as son walks the Anfield plank

Andy Hunter
Monday 11 January 2010

Tom Hicks remained bullish in the wake of his son's resignation from Liverpool today when he pledged a "big" summer in the transfer market at Anfield and replaced the outgoing director with another Dallas-based ally.

Hicks's son, Tom Jr, bowed to pressure to relinquish his directorship of Liverpool and its parent company, Kop Holdings, following the furore over the obscene email he sent to a Liverpool supporter in a row over Rafael Benítez's spending power.

His place on the board has been taken by Casey Coffman, vice-president of Hicks Holdings and the chief operating officer of Hicks Sports Group, while Liverpool confirmed that Philip Nash and Ian Ayre, the club's chief financial officer and commercial director respectively, have been appointed directors.

The departure of Hicks Jr was announced this morning after he sent an abusive email to a supporter whom he told to "Blow me **** face". It is understood the Liverpool director offered to resign when the controversy erupted on Saturday night, with the supporters' union, Spirit of Shankly, demanding his resignation and describing his position as untenable, before the decision was ratified 24 hours later.

A statement issued on behalf of Hicks Jr read: "I have great respect for Liverpool Football Club, especially the Club's supporters. I apologise for my mistake and I am very sorry for my harmful words. I do not want my actions to take away from the Club's future; therefore I am resigning from the Board. To the fans and to the Club, please accept my sincerest apologies."

Unsurprisingly, given their determination to remove Hicks and George Gillett as owners of Liverpool, the Spirit of Shankly group welcomed the American's decision to step down. A spokesperson said: "This club has standards; on the field, off the field, on the terraces and in the boardroom. The standards we have seen exercised in the boardroom have been unbefitting of this great club since Hicks Jr, his father, George Gillett and other associates arrived at the Club with false promises."

The dispute between Hicks Jr and the supporter, Stephen Horner, was prompted by last week's revelations that Benítez will have little to spend in this transfer window even if the Liverpool manager raises more than £15m through player sales. The club has so far raised £6.4m by selling Andriy Voronin and Andrea Dossena to Dynamo Moscow and Napoli respectively and are also hoping to offload Philipp Degen and Ryan Babel before the end of the month. Benítez has resisted efforts to cut his losses with Babel, however, amid concerns his budget will stretch no further than the proposed £1.5m signing of Maxi Rodríguez from Atlético Madrid and possibly one other loan deal.

Liverpool officials say Benítez's budget is a sensible approach to the difficult January transfer market and revenue raised now will be reinvested in the squad in the summer.

The Liverpool manager has already started preparations for next season, with the Bordeaux striker Marouane Chamakh a target on a free transfer.

That stance was echoed by Hicks himself today when, shortly after the announcement of his son's resignation, he responded to another supporter's inquiry about transfer plans with the email that, in hindsight, Hicks Jr should have sent to Horner. The Liverpool co-owner said: "Our debt is very managable (sic) [see Man U] and we never use player sales for debt service. Our interest on £200m is about £16m. The new stadium will be the game changer. Christian [Purslow] is working very hard on it. Jan is a poor-quality market. The summer window will be big."

Purslow, Liverpool's managing director, is engaged in a worldwide search for new investors in the club as Hicks and Gillett seek an equity raise that would reduce their shareholdings but enable work on the proposed stadium in Stanley Park finally to begin.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jan/11/liverpool-tom-hicks-junior-resigns
 
huh ?

I'd say wait til the summer before condemning them. They've made a noose for themselves with this one.
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=38394.msg1031580#msg1031580 date=1263246742]
huh ?

I'd say wait til the summer before condemning them. They've made a noose for themselves with this one.
[/quote]

I suspect it will be one more lie to add to the list (No debt/stadium).
 
I guess he is going to cut his son's allowance, and give it to us to use in the transfer market.
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=38394.msg1031598#msg1031598 date=1263248555]
I can't be bothered reading all that. Can someone some it up in a sentance (not witty, accurate please!?
[/quote]
No value in Jan, summer will be big for us.
 
Ah, so we are reassured after a shit January with a "the spade will be in the ground in 60 days" type promise then?
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=38394.msg1031602#msg1031602 date=1263248751]
Ah, so we are reassured after a shit January with a "the spade will be in the ground in 60 days" type promise then?
[/quote]

Pretty much, yeah.
Like Rosco said, yet another noose for them should this not come to pass.
 
The one thing I'd say is that Hicks tends to be the one that's fairly open and honest with the press. He was the one that admitted that Gillett had met Klinsmann and suggested him as a replacement should Rafa make good his threats to walk out.
 
The statement of " a spade in the ground in 60 days" is going to haunt Gillet for a long time if he stays with the club. Other than that, though, it's pretty hard to find any false statements - particularly from Hicks.

Since they arrived we've smashed the transfer record for strikers to Liverpool, midfielders to Liverpool and defenders to Liverpool.


The only point of frustration I've had is that they didn't bring in an investor for 20% or so prior to the bubble bursting; there were a number of potential suitors at the time who were all caught up in the "fad" of investing in football teams.


Hindsight makes it seem a more obvious mistake but I thought that was the time to do something. The fans could still have been a major factor in their favour if they'd done so and thereby found the capital to start the stadium. No doubt their fall out didn't help but, otherwise, there doesn't appear many instances of false statements.
 
[quote author=Skullflower link=topic=38394.msg1031576#msg1031576 date=1263245529]

That stance was echoed by Hicks himself today when, shortly after the announcement of his son's resignation, he responded to another supporter's inquiry about transfer plans with the email that, in hindsight, Hicks Jr should have sent to Horner. The Liverpool co-owner said: "Our debt is very managable (sic) [see Man U] and we never use player sales for debt service. Our interest on £200m is about £16m. The new stadium will be the game changer. Christian [Purslow] is working very hard on it. Jan is a poor-quality market. The summer window will be big."

Purslow, Liverpool's managing director, is engaged in a worldwide search for new investors in the club as Hicks and Gillett seek an equity raise that would reduce their shareholdings but enable work on the proposed stadium in Stanley Park finally to begin.[/b]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/jan/11/liverpool-tom-hicks-junior-resigns

[/quote]

But we are going to sell Fernando aren't we?
 
From The Times
January 12, 2010
Tony Barrett

Tom Hicks dismisses controversy and promises Liverpool will spend

Tom Hicks has shrugged aside the controversial resignation of his son from the Liverpool board by claiming that the club’s debt problems are not as severe as those of Manchester United.

The Liverpool co-owner also vowed to spend “big†in the summer transfer window.

In a day of high drama for the two North-West giants, Tom Hicks Jr announced that he was stepping down as a Liverpool director after admitting sending an abusive e-mail to a fan.

United, meanwhile, announced plans to raise £500 million to restructure their debts after paying out £41.9 million in interest during the past financial year.

United’s problems gave Hicks an opportunity to divert attention from the storm at his own club and he duly took it.

In an e-mail of his own to a fan, he intimated that Liverpool’s debt — in excess of £200 million — is more manageable than that of their great rivals.

He also insisted that while Liverpool will not be splashing out in the present transfer window, they are already planning to invest heavily in the summer to bolster Rafael Benítez’s squad, and claimed the long-awaited new stadium will be delivered.

“Our debt is very manageable (see Man U) and we never use player sales for debt service,†Hicks Sr wrote in the e-mail, responding to concerns from a supporter that Liverpool will not be big spenders in January.

“Our interest on £200 million is about £16 million. The new stadium will be the game changer. January is a poor quality market. The summer window will be big.

“We are working hard on the new stadium. We have an excellent management team and manager. We know we need more depth on the squad and will address it this summer. We hope to have a stronger second half of the season.â€

Liverpool’s search for investment is continuing, but there is evidence that the financial concerns that have plagued them for so long are beginning to filter down to Benítez’s playing squad.

Ryan Babel, the Holland forward, responded to a question on Twitter, the social networking site, about his opinion on Hicks and George Gillett Jr, his fellow American, by saying: “We need money for the club.â€

It is that apparent weakness that has prompted fears that Steven Gerrard, Fernando Torres or both could be prised away from Anfield should Liverpool fail to qualify for next season’s Champions League. Reports in Italy suggest that José Mourinho will launch his third attempt to sign Gerrard, this time for Inter Milan rather than Chelsea, next summer.

The chances of Gerrard leaving Liverpool for an Italian club are remote, but rivals sensing weakness at Anfield will give their supporters added cause for concern.

The resignation of Hicks Jr from the club’s board at least solved one problem, the Texan falling on his sword after he sent an abusive e-mail to Stephen Horner, a Liverpool fan, in which he said: “Blow me, f***face.â€

The Liverpool hierarchy did not hesitate to accept Hicks’s offer to step down. His place has been taken by Casey Coffman, the executive vice-president of Hicks Holdings.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/liverpool/article6984376.ece
 
I'm gonna give hicks the benefit of the doubt until 31st August then. And he doesn't just need to bring us players, the stadium better be underway.
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=38394.msg1031644#msg1031644 date=1263253463]
I'm gonna give hicks the benefit of the doubt until 31st August then. And he doesn't just need to bring us players, the stadium better be underway.
[/quote]

Haha. Or what?
 
I wish there was someway to wipe clean their laughably poor public relations history since they took over the club. From a purely financial point of view they have a lot left to prove but they have also accomplished a fair bit, up until the recession interceded. How they respond throughout 2010 will determine the fate of the club over the next decade. Unfortunately, in almost every other sphere, most notably public relations, they have been an unmitigated disaster.
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=38394.msg1031644#msg1031644 date=1263253463]
I'm gonna give hicks the benefit of the doubt until 31st August then. And he doesn't just need to bring us players, the stadium better be underway.
[/quote]
I have no expectation that things will ever get better under him and Georgey.
 
Of course the summer will be big as every player who features in the world cup will have a jacked up price. I dont believe a word they say, we will have to see if it happens.
 
[quote author=Garmy link=topic=38394.msg1031693#msg1031693 date=1263273777]
Here's hoping he doesn't consider Torres being sold as "big".
[/quote]

I'm pretty sure that would qualify as selling a player to service debt. 😉


They haven't done it yet and, thus far, the only people who have suggested it will happen are journalist hacks looking to sell inches and paranoid posters on football forums. We're further away from that happening than we are from finding an investor for a 25% stake at 100m.
 
[quote author=Wizardry link=topic=38394.msg1031630#msg1031630 date=1263251341]
The statement of " a spade in the ground in 60 days" is going to haunt Gillet for a long time if he stays with the club. Other than that, though, it's pretty hard to find any false statements - particularly from Hicks.

Since they arrived we've smashed the transfer record for strikers to Liverpool, midfielders to Liverpool and defenders to Liverpool.


The only point of frustration I've had is that they didn't bring in an investor for 20% or so prior to the bubble bursting; there were a number of potential suitors at the time who were all caught up in the "fad" of investing in football teams.


Hindsight makes it seem a more obvious mistake but I thought that was the time to do something. The fans could still have been a major factor in their favour if they'd done so and thereby found the capital to start the stadium. No doubt their fall out didn't help but, otherwise, there doesn't appear many instances of false statements.
[/quote]

I wonder what would have happened if we HAD started building! Considering the credit crunch I really doubt it would had have been good for LFC. The internet forums would probably be fuming to why-o-why did those stupid yanks start buiding in the middle of a credit crunch!
 
I guess the other side of this is that, if there's an element of truth (big 'if') in that the money is being saved until the Summer, then there's a severe element of mistrust going on from the owners to Benitez, and this may well be a signal that they're saving the money for the Summer on the possibility that we may have a new manager who will obviously need significant funds to spend.
 
Hicks is always happy to imply he'll let money be spent in a few months, then Purslow pops up in a few months with some weird stats to deny money hasn't been spent even though no one seems to have arrived. In September Hicks was happily hinting that some sponsorship money would be spent now.

Liverpool announced a shirt sponsorship agreement on Monday with Standard Chartered.

"We are seeing for the first time the real power of the brand and the power of a well managed club,'' Hicks said. "I feel very good about the entire club. The total sponsorship contracts should probably bring in £25m, £26m of incremental revenue a year. It's a huge development for the club.''

Hicks expects manager Rafa Benitez to be contacting him and managing director Christian Purslow about using some of the revenue to buy players in the January transfer window.

"Knowing Rafa Benitez I suspect he's got his eye on part of it,'' Hicks said
 
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=38394.msg1031724#msg1031724 date=1263288496]
Hicks is always happy to imply he'll let money be spent in a few months, then Purslow pops up in a few months with some weird stats to deny money hasn't been spent even though no one seems to have arrived. In September Hicks was happily hinting that some sponsorship money would be spent now.

Liverpool announced a shirt sponsorship agreement on Monday with Standard Chartered.

"We are seeing for the first time the real power of the brand and the power of a well managed club,'' Hicks said. "I feel very good about the entire club. The total sponsorship contracts should probably bring in £25m, £26m of incremental revenue a year. It's a huge development for the club.''

Hicks expects manager Rafa Benitez to be contacting him and managing director Christian Purslow about using some of the revenue to buy players in the January transfer window.

"Knowing Rafa Benitez I suspect he's got his eye on part of it,'' Hicks said
[/quote]

£25,000,000 incremental revenue a year?

Well, so far it looks like whatever bit Rafa had his eye on, what he actually got was the very last digit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom