• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Gillett claims the club is in 'outstanding' financial shape etc.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Frogfish

Gone to Redcafe
Member
On Our Economic Situation

George Gillett, the Liverpool co-owner, has claimed that the economic situation at the club has "never been stronger" - a statement likely to anger supporters frustrated by the limited transfer funds given to Rafael Benitez this summer and by the lack of progress on building a new stadium.

Benitez, the manager, appeared to be operating with a restricted budget during the transfer window but Gillett, who along with Tom Hicks bought Liverpool in 2007, has told a Toronto radio station that the club's finances were not merely robust but in rude health.

"The club is in outstanding shape," Gillett said. "Economically, it's never been stronger. We just paid down our debt very substantially. We have less debt per dollar than any club in the league." Hicks and Gillett bought Liverpool for £435 million using money borrowed from the Royal Bank of Scotland and Wachovia, but were forced to refinance their debts in July this year. To help ease the financial pressure, Gillett sold his interest in the Montreal Canadiens ice hockey club.

Gillett added that he was "probably" at Liverpool for the long term, but "if someone gets beamed in who's got bags of money, things may change".

New Stadium

The need for a new stadium or a significantly-rebuilt Anfield is apparent but Hicks and Gillett have not succeeded in raising the estimated £500million it would cost to build a new 60,000-capacity home in Stanley Park. A realistic best-case scenario would see the new venue finished in time for the 2018 World Cup finals, some six years later than originally planned.

Gillett said that the stadium plans would be revived "as the world economy gets better - if and when it gets better". He implied that the finished article would be less ambitious than originally envisaged. "We were going to build an iconic stadium previously," he said. "The world economy has certainly suggested that that would be a good suggestion. But in the normal world, building a stadium in the 65,000 to 75,000 seat range - we would look forward to that."

New Shirt Sponsor

The club will unveil a new shirt sponsor on September 18. Their long association with Carlsberg is set to finish at the end of this season. "I think people will be pleased and surprised. It will be one of the great, worldwide corporations.

And I think it will be a sponsor people will be pleased and surprised to be [associated with] Liverpool," Gillett said.

__________________________________________________________________________________

Just what does he mean by " But in the normal world, building a stadium in the 65,000 to 75,000 seat range - we would look forward to that." ? One moment he seems to be suggesting the stadium will be somewhat less than envisaged then he's saying he looks forward to a 65 - 70k seater !
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35771.msg941892#msg941892 date=1252690157]
Froggie won't like it we merge it though.

I'll leave it to Paddy to do it
[/quote]

Twat.

Froggy is the KING of posting up repeat threads. Every day.
 
It wouldn't be so bad if it was better than the first thread, but it was a poor substitute despite all the bold red text 😉

regards
 
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=35771.msg941891#msg941891 date=1252690131]
There is a thread with a radio link to the whole interview two posts down

regards
[/quote]

Which is fine if your internet connection is fast enough (mine's not at the moment - it kept freezing) ! Or you are not in work !
 
[quote author=Paddy link=topic=35771.msg941894#msg941894 date=1252690362]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35771.msg941892#msg941892 date=1252690157]
Froggie won't like it we merge it though.

I'll leave it to Paddy to do it
[/quote]

Twat.

Froggy is the KING of posting up repeat threads. Every day.
[/quote]

Different time zones mate. Soz !
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35771.msg941892#msg941892 date=1252690157]
Froggie won't like it we merge it though.

I'll leave it to Paddy to do it
[/quote]

;D
 
not wishing to be pedantic but he said a less impressive stadium in the 65 to 72 range..... not 75.

Either way it wont be built with them as owners.
 
[quote author=Molbystwin link=topic=35771.msg941911#msg941911 date=1252694103]
not wishing to be pedantic but he said a less impressive stadium in the 65 to 72 range..... not 75.

Either way it wont be built with them as owners.
[/quote]

A 5 looks very like a 2 to me without my reading glasses !

I'm still convinced Robbie wore #28
 
[quote author=Frogfish link=topic=35771.msg941931#msg941931 date=1252695649]
[quote author=Molbystwin link=topic=35771.msg941911#msg941911 date=1252694103]
not wishing to be pedantic but he said a less impressive stadium in the 65 to 72 range..... not 75.

Either way it wont be built with them as owners.
[/quote]

A 5 looks very like a 2 to me without my reading glasses !

I'm still convinced Robbie wore #28
[/quote] ;D
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35771.msg941892#msg941892 date=1252690157]
Froggie won't like it we merge it though.

I'll leave it to Paddy to do it
[/quote]

he's the expert moderator in this place!!!

Merge away paddy!!
 
"We have less debt per dollar than any club in the league."

What the fuck does that mean??
 
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=35771.msg941891#msg941891 date=1252690131]
There is a thread with a radio link to the whole interview two posts down

regards
[/quote]

Frankly, Vladders, I'm disappointed you haven't posted a pervy link. I thought that was a new tradition. 🙁
 
[quote author=Mors link=topic=35771.msg941993#msg941993 date=1252700562]
"We have less debt per dollar than any club in the league."

What the fuck does that mean??
[/quote]

Debt/Book Value of the club

is what he means i think.
 
[quote author=madmax link=topic=35771.msg942085#msg942085 date=1252724336]
[quote author=Mors link=topic=35771.msg941993#msg941993 date=1252700562]
"We have less debt per dollar than any club in the league."

What the fuck does that mean??
[/quote]

Debt/Book Value of the club

is what he means i think.
[/quote]

What about Man City?
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=35771.msg942570#msg942570 date=1252779781]
[quote author=madmax link=topic=35771.msg942085#msg942085 date=1252724336]
[quote author=Mors link=topic=35771.msg941993#msg941993 date=1252700562]
"We have less debt per dollar than any club in the league."

What the fuck does that mean??
[/quote]

Debt/Book Value of the club

is what he means i think.
[/quote]

What about Man City?
[/quote]

They probably are still in debt in the form of interest free loans to the club from the owner. That's how Roman invested in Chelsea.
 
Liverpool Owners Planned Ticket Rise as Debt Refinancing Loomed

By Tariq Panja

Sept. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Liverpool’s owners proposed increasing the soccer club’s average ticket price by 8 percent and raising 100 million pounds ($163 million) from investors and loans as pressure built to refinance debt of 290 million pounds.

The team’s U.S. owners George Gillett and Tom Hicks considered selling equity in the 18-time English league champion to pay down their debts with Royal Bank of Scotland Plc and Wachovia Corp., according to documents prepared by the club’s bankers and obtained by Bloomberg News. Jonathon Brill, a spokesman for Liverpool’s owners, declined to comment. He confirmed the documents.

Gillett and Hicks paid 50 million pounds in July to get a year’s extension to the debt facility they used to purchase and run the club since their February 2007 takeover. Liverpool owes about 240 million pounds to the banks. Fans of the five-time European champion have criticized the owners for backtracking on a pledge not to raise the club’s debt and delaying work on a new 72,000-seat stadium. Ticket prices stayed the same in the end.

“It would have been a very unpopular move†to increase prices, said Rogan Taylor, director of the Football Industry Group at Liverpool University and a member of a supporter-led group trying to acquire the club. “It looks like they took some wise advice not to do it.â€

The proposed hike, which came as the majority of the 20 English Premier League clubs decided to freeze or reduce the price of some tickets for the 2009-2010 season, was one of a number of revenue-boosting plans outlined in the document. Liverpool may convert 1,000 regular seats into corporate seating by July 2011 and establish its own soccer academies.

100 Million Pounds

The March 2009 prospectus drawn up by investment banks Rothschild and Merrill Lynch tells potential investors that for 50 million pounds they would get a minority stake in “one of the world’s most successful football clubs.†The document says Liverpool was considering raising another 50 million pounds in high-interest payment-in-kind loans that would’ve ended up costing 104.4 million pounds by the end of a five-year term.

In June, Kop Football (Holdings) Ltd., the club’s parent company, reported a loss of 42.6 million pounds for the year ended July 2008 on interest charges of 36.5 million pounds.

According to the document, all but 5 million pounds of the new 100 million pounds the club was trying to access would have gone toward reducing its debts. U.K. media have reported that the new money would kick-start the stadium project.

Liverpool last week announced a record sponsorship with Standard Chartered Plc, which will pay about 20 million pounds a season to replace Carlsberg A/S on the front of the players’ shirts. The document reveals Liverpool had forecast that it would retain the brewer by charging it 14.2 million pounds a season. Other forecasts in the prospectus include player wages and manager Rafael Benitez’s transfer budget until 2014.

Transfer Pot

According to management, Benitez would have about 20 million pounds a season to spend on new players, a figure that “will grow together with increases in broadcast revenues,†the document said.

Liverpool made a profit in the last transfer window after the purchase of defender Glen Johnson was offset by the 30 million euro ($44 million) sale of Xabi Alonso to Real Madrid. Player wages will increase to 115.2 million pounds from the current level of 81.7 million, the club estimates.

Other details of Liverpool’s future commercial strategy are outlined in the document alongside the increased corporate seating and Liverpool-branded academies. New secondary sponsors will be targeted and catering facilities improved to increase commercial revenue to 111.4 million pounds from 59 million pounds in the next five years.
 
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=35771.msg949143#msg949143 date=1253722500]
Players wages going up £33.5M
[/quote]

How is such a rise possible?
 
[quote author=keniget link=topic=35771.msg949159#msg949159 date=1253727271]
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=35771.msg949143#msg949143 date=1253722500]
Players wages going up £33.5M
[/quote]

How is such a rise possible?
[/quote]

Agger and Torres got big rises
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35771.msg949163#msg949163 date=1253727413]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=35771.msg949159#msg949159 date=1253727271]
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=35771.msg949143#msg949143 date=1253722500]
Players wages going up £33.5M
[/quote]

How is such a rise possible?
[/quote]

Agger and Torres got big rises
[/quote]

So did Benayoun.
 
them 3 wouldn't even account for 5 million of the rise, unless it's over their whole contract which defeats the point of the notion.
 
[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=35771.msg949167#msg949167 date=1253728171]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=35771.msg949163#msg949163 date=1253727413]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=35771.msg949159#msg949159 date=1253727271]
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=35771.msg949143#msg949143 date=1253722500]
Players wages going up £33.5M
[/quote]

How is such a rise possible?
[/quote]

Agger and Torres got big rises
[/quote]

So did Benayoun.
[/quote]

Did Mascher get his?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom