If we signing the best young players then this strategy could work.
However, we seem to target the level just below **top class** even for younger players probably because they dont ask for high wages.
It's far too risk-laden an enterprise to be sure of identifying 'the best young players' - if by young one means under 20 - because you're really just identifying potential. I don't think the club has done badly with that at all. If by young one means players in the 20-23 bracket, then, yes, we usually lose out as far as the best are concerned, but again you're largely going for potential rather than empirically proven stars. But as I said in the invisible post above, the latter strategy is about as new as pass and move. It used to work better mainly because there was a much more organic process of schooling the signings in the reserves, and partly because, well, we were just better at spotting young talent.