• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Former ref Gallagher lifts lid on Fergie's cheeky tactics with officials

Status
Not open for further replies.

hamstrung_pigeon

Well-Known
Member
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...her-lifts-lid-Fergies-influence-referees.html

'Do me a favour and call the game off': Former ref Gallagher lifts lid on Fergie's cheeky tactics with officials

Dermot Gallagher claims Sir Alex Ferguson asked him to call game off against Middlesbrough in 1997
Former ref says ex-United boss wanted fixture replayed to help with title bid

By Craig Hope

PUBLISHED: 13:58 GMT, 6 February 2014 | UPDATED: 16:46 GMT, 6 February 2014

Former referee Dermot Gallagher has lifted the lid on Sir Alex Ferguson's intimidation tactics.

And, with figures showing 'Fergie Time' has been slashed since the Scot's departure, the official has revealed the pressure referees were under during Manchester United home matches.

Gallagher recalls one particular episode when United were chasing the title in 1997 - which they duly won - and welcomed Middlesbrough to a sodden Old Trafford.

'It was chucking it down with rain and Fergie pulled me aside and said “do me a favour, call the game off’," Gallagher told Sportlobster TV.

'I asked why and he said “there’s nowhere else to fit this game in and the Premier League will have to extend the season. We’ll have a better chance of winning the match and we’ll win the league at Old Trafford”.

'At half time United were losing 3-1 and the pitch was like a swimming pool. As we came off he said “I know we’re 3-1 down but please call it off, we could do with a hand here”.

'They managed to pull it back to 3-3 and in the last minute Dennis Irwin ran into the box and went down in front of the Stretford End and I only gave a goal kick.

'At full-time Fergie sprinted across the pitch and shouted at me furiously. My wife said, “Fergie had a right go at you about that penalty didn’t he”.

'I told her he hadn’t mentioned the penalty. She asked why he came tearing across the pitch at me then. The truth is he ran over and asked me if I was going out to dinner that night. I said “no” and he asked “why are we leaving so early then?”.'

Indeed, Ferguson's ability to squeeze every last second out of officials when his side were losing has since been highlighted.

With United trailing at Old Trafford under their former boss, an average of 79 seconds extra was played in added time.

However, this compares to just 40 seconds extra under his successor David Moyes.

Gallagher went on to reveal the anxiety caused by not awarding key decisions to United.

'Years and years ago one of the referees had a heart monitor on during a match at Old Trafford,' he explained.

'They were assessing it and suddenly it jumped and went through the roof. They looked at the DVD and he’d just turned down a penalty in front of the Stretford End. The pressure is immense.'
 
Yet another reason why instant replays would help officials. Blatter and Platini are just 19th Century cunts.
 
People talk about Fergie Time like it's a novelty thing, like it's a national treasure or something.
The fact that refs are admitting it openly should cause serious concerns with the authorities of the game.

In some places, match-fixing allegations have been raised over these sort of matters.
 
People talk about Fergie Time like it's a novelty thing, like it's a national treasure or something.
The fact that refs are admitting it openly should cause serious concerns with the authorities of the game.

In some places, match-fixing allegations have been raised over these sort of matters.

The authorities were complicit in it though. They were terrified of him and the trouble he could cause them, so they let it all happen. Now they have to make like none of it ever did, in order not to get hammered for their weakness and cowardice while it was going on.
 
How many weeks, or months, of accumulated suspended bans did he end up with? It was farcical. Every other player and manager actually got bans. With Ginsoak it took the FA about four times as long to decide on a ban and then it was nearly always 'suspended'.
 
I honestly don't get why everybody was so scared of him. Is he some sort of gangland warlord and has hid it extremely well? Or rather are these poncey refs scared of an alcoholic shouting at them for a little bit?
 
Well, when you have one of the board members of the FA (who would later become the VP) as your club's chief executive.....there will be reasonable doubts raised.

The only manager who dared to voice these doubts in public was Rafa, and look what happened to him eventually.
 
I honestly don't get why everybody was so scared of him. Is he some sort of gangland warlord and has hid it extremely well? Or rather are these poncey refs scared of an alcoholic shouting at them for a little bit?

On the face of it, yes it seems absurd, but it does seem that if refs are criticised by Ferguson then there is some kind of consequence. There have been cases of referees getting on the wrong side of Ferguson and then essentially banned from refereeing United games, and I think it was Alan Wiley who was never refereed at all again the season after Ferguson slagged him off.

Of course the whole reason for United's success was not because Ferguson intimidated referees (although he did, and he seemed happy for his players to do the same) but it didn't do any harm, and must have earned him a few extra points each season.

More fool the referees and the FA for letting him get away with it though.
 
Still the media are frightened of him. It's 'cheeky'. It's 'mind games'. It's not 'deliberate attempts to intimidate FA officials'.
 
It's cringe-making. What they say is "cheeky/mind games" etc. What they mean is "If we say these things we can try and justify not taking him on".
 
I honestly don't get why everybody was so scared of him. Is he some sort of gangland warlord and has hid it extremely well? Or rather are these poncey refs scared of an alcoholic shouting at them for a little bit?

Because he can effectively ruin someone's career with great ease, and I'm sure he has done in the past.

The BBC were the only ones with the balls to stand up to him, and the FA still shy'd away from forcing him to stand by his commitments.
 
Practically everyone in footy has now transferred this horrible forelock-tugging nonsense to Maureen. He mentions horses, and they're all talking about horses. It's embarrassing to see adults act like they're in thrall of twits like this.

It's so fucking sad. They did it in every match commentary.

I really wish they'd find a commentator who was capable of talking about the match & what was going on in the actual football game they're witnessing, of which the audience are privvy to only about 15% of when watching on television at home, instead of banging on about incidents & bollocks surrounding the sport.

I regularly listen to the radio commentary on delay (so it's in sync) alongside the television as you get more of a picture of tactics that way, which is sad.
 
Practically everyone in footy has now transferred this horrible forelock-tugging nonsense to Maureen. He mentions horses, and they're all talking about horses. It's embarrassing to see adults act like they're in thrall of twits like this.


BR: I won't talk about horses. I'll focus on my players.
 
Still the media are frightened of him. It's 'cheeky'. It's 'mind games'. It's not 'deliberate attempts to intimidate FA officials'.

Absolutely. They chuckle about it in a really cosy, 'oh good old Fergie, what a character', kinda way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom