In this particular case, it applies to his father, who is a cunt for not immediately smothering his cunt child with a pillow and feeding him to the dogs.
Dermot Gallagher explains the penos for the simpletons
- Thread starter Rosco
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
In this particular case, it applies to his father, who is a cunt for not immediately smothering his cunt child with a pillow and feeding him to the dogs.
Except for those of us who were Caesarean deliveries.
Did they have the technology for such medical procedures in those days?
Haha, no worries mark.
And Dantes, the first recorded Caesareans were performed in Roman times. Even I'm not quite that old. Yet.
And Dantes, the first recorded Caesareans were performed in Roman times. Even I'm not quite that old. Yet.
[article]
It was a clear dive and the referee, Jon Moss, was right to caution him. Alli has been guilty in the past of exaggerating contact. Because he’s been caught he only gets a yellow card, whereas if it had been missed by Moss, it would have been spotted retrospectively and he’d have been banned for two games. I’ve argued before that the same offence should get the same punishment and everyone who gets caught diving should be banned for two games, whether or not it is spotted on the day.
FIRST PENALTY
1. Was it offside?
This should not have been a penalty because it was offside. At Anfield, because of the atmosphere, it can be difficult to hear each other on the headsets, which is why Moss went over to talk to his assistant Eddie Smart. The assistant had said that Harry Kane was in an offside position. The question then is whether Dejan Lovren deliberately played the ball and has Kane, by being in an offside position, impacted Lovren.
The issue is not whether it touched the defender, but whether he played it deliberately. A professional footballer would not have played it into Kane’s path on purpose. From the way he was facing, if it had been deliberate, the ball would have gone up the field. You can make an argument that Lovren would not have made this type of attempt for the ball if Kane was not close to him and, therefore, the impact of his presence plays a part in the decision-making of the referee.
2. Was it a dive?
It shouldn’t have been a penalty because it was offside, but Kane didn’t dive. Loris Karius just caught him — there wasn’t much contact but there was some — and the Liverpool goalkeeper’s reaction says it all. He immediately put his head to the turf. He knew he’d made a terrible error. If there had been no contact he’d have leapt up immediately and accused Kane of cheating.
SECOND PENALTY
This a tough decision. I believe that there is a suspicion of offside in the build up to the penalty. The ball is touched by Fernando Llorente and into Érik Lamela, who is fractionally offside in my opinion. As we have seen with VAR now, offside is a matter of fact and no benefit is given to the attacking team. Therefore, the penalty should not have been allowed. Once the offside is missed, It looks as though Virgil van Dijk goes to kick the ball and then tries to pull away his leg, but there is a still a bit of contact. It is a soft penalty, but not definitely a wrong call.
I can see why Moss didn’t originally give it and I was surprised Smart flagged it as a penalty. It is rare and very brave for an assistant referee to do that when it seemed like a 50-50 call. In that situation, I would have wanted some discussion and for the assistant to tell me what he had seen. I would then make a decision. Once the assistant’s flag has gone up, Moss is bound to give it as he has got to publicly support his colleague. To be fair to Moss, I thought he refereed the game very well, but the team work at the end could have been improved and he needed better support from his assistant referee
[/article]
Maybe this should be in a new thread? You could title it "Mark Clattenburg explains the penos for Dermot Gallagher and other cunts".
Yeah. Very bizzare.
I'd much rather he complained about the wasted money on AOC.
VVD was very good yesterday. Kept the best forward in the league very quiet. Just days after he had bullied United's defence.
I think his only faults in the game were keeping Son onside when he ran through and losing a header to Llorente. Every other action was superb.
As for Dermot Gallagher, he's doing the old pal's act. I guarantee had Moss not given it, he would be saying how the referee made a fabalous decision to overrule the linesman and would be using the 2nd angle posted above to justify it. At the end of day, the referees stick together. As Moss did with his linesman, even though he didn't think it was a foul, he felt compelled to give it because his linesman (clear the alpha in their group) had visibly flagged and had start moving around to his position before the referee had even signalled for the pen. He gave Moss no choice but to give it, or publically embarrass their entire profession by telling him to fcuk off.
I can't help but feel the linesman wanted to make a name for himself. And he did. We all know his name now. Smart. (Pun intended).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42943628
No mention that he had a wild fucking guess as neither of the officials knew if Lovren had touched the ball. What happened to referees having to be sure about a decision otherwise they can't make one. It's a refereeing version of trying to cheat.
No mention that he had a wild fucking guess as neither of the officials knew if Lovren had touched the ball. What happened to referees having to be sure about a decision otherwise they can't make one. It's a refereeing version of trying to cheat.
We’re they penalties or weren’t they? It doesn’t really matter as they were both given and ultimately we drew a game we played fairly poorly in. Debating any such decisions is a waste of time because it doesn’t change anything . The only decision worth a debate is whether Kane dived for the first or not as its the only incident that can have a follow on action.
That's how I usually see things. It hurts to lose like that but I won't be going around blaming it on the ref or claiming we was robbed.
I just find it odd that a Liverpool fan would not only hold the opinion that they were both correct decisions, but also go on to insult fans who disagree.
At best, they were both 50/50 in the moment. With video hindsight, the one that led to a goal was technically offside, nevermind the fact that the foul itself could be debated.
Jon Moss is back on Merseyside this weekend fucking up the dire fixture that is Everton v Palace.
I'm sure he'll get an unusually good welcome from the home fans
- Status