You do know why he wasn't fit for the start of the season? Right?
Because he didn't make an effort
You do know why he wasn't fit for the start of the season? Right?
What did I get wrong Ross? He's scored 11 goals as an impact player for them, and 7 of them in the league. So I got the total right and not the league goals, big whoopdy fucking do.
Those 7 goals could have won us 9-12 points more had we signed him from the start of the season. In the end I'm very happy we didnt because it resulted in us getting Coutinho and Sturridge which is a much better outcome, yet something we DIDNT know in August.
So in other words, you have as usual absolutly no idea what you're on about. Using stats when you feel like it, thinking managers doesnt matter and that ALL PLAYERS LOSE THEIR LEGS WHEN THEY HIT 30 AND MUST BE SHOT AND TURNED IN TO GLUE.
So shut yer trap and stop trolling.
Because he didn't make an effort
Nothing to do with Fulham getting a shitty on and refusing to play him in any preseason games or allowing him to be part of the their preseason preparation then? He missed the whole of preseason.
And of course there's no possible other way he could have gotten fit
Match fit? Don't be a fucking imbecile.
The point is you're wrong about everything, all of the time. And when I call you out on it you say I'm trolling.
Stop being wrong all the time and you won't feel like I'm trolling when I talk sense
So you agree now that it would have been a bad idea to sign Dempsey, imagine if you had the ability to rationalise why it was a bad idea at the outset ? You'd be looking at the things I do (and the likes of dmishra and Delinquent who are usually right), yet all you do is try to (badly) take the piss - while regurgitating a load of falsehoods that are commonly held as footballing wisdom.
Hahaha, christ. I'm wrong all the time? You're negative 98% of the time and are bound to be right about something. Its like answering the same to every question someone asks you, you'll eventually get something right.
No, I still think he'd be a good signing. 11 goals in 37 games would have gotten us some extra points and maybe a longer cup run.
It worked out better with us signing Coutinho and Sturridge, but that wasnt possible in August.
And get over yourself, I've yet to see you being right about anything to be honest.
The bizzarre manager stance and that you cant buy a player past 30.
Yet when people call you out on most of it you just disapear from the threads.
If we got Dempsey in the summer, there was no way we were getting Sturridge in January. Sturidge was bought, to make up for the summer fuck-up where we let Carroll go and failed to replace him.Maybe if we had've signed Dempsey early in the window we wouldn't have bothered our arses signing Borini or Assaidi, then still got Coutinho and Sturridge, that sounds alright to me.
If we got Dempsey in the summer, there was no way we were getting Sturridge in January. Sturidge was bought, to make up for the summer fuck-up where we let Carroll go and failed to replace him.
We wanted Sturridge in the Summer too but balked at the price, apparently we saved £5m waiting until Jan.
It's amazing how you and others constantly take things out of context and confuse yourselves.
You're the same person who wanted Downing for 20m, you then wanted to replace him with Dempsey for 6m. If we had unlimited funds we could replace one flavour of the year with another each summer. Unfortunately when you're handing out contracts for three and four years you can't afford to work that way, you've got to give those contracts to players who are going to be good for the duration of the contract.
People wanted Dempsey because he hit 18 Premier League goals, making him "proven". It was a fluke. You have to be totally ignorant of trends in football and player performance to think he was going to repeat that, but lots of people still wanted him. In a much better team he then scored 7 league goals. Spurs still have him for two more years, is he going to bounce back to score lots more next season ?
Wait, you wanted both Dempsey AND Downing to be in the squad? And you're still not thinking that that would be a bad thing? Who else would you want to join them, David Bentley?
I don't think we are a million miles away from 4th. As I said in the Sturridge thread, if we had signed both Sturridge and Coutinho in the summer, we'd be much higher up the table. If Suarez stays, and we can even improve part of our defensive problems, I think 4th spot is a realistic target next season.Hansern, some of what you say makes sense. Occasionally older players can be good deals, when they are the missing piece of the puzzle.
The problem is we're missing about 10 pieces, I said this about Downing at the time we signed him - he's not the difference between us and fourth so he didn't warrant the outlay. The same can be said of Dempsey. No single player is going to be the difference between seventh and fourth right now.
We are a million miles away from a place where we can think sort term and buy average older players at a peak cost for marginal improvements. Constantly adding these expensive average players is why we are where we are, it's not going to get us out of the shit.
We need to collect younger talents right now, not all of them will succeed but when we get a few good ones together we'll have the core we need. Then we can think about adding expensive pieces to the squad.
Someone didn't know how to spell dempseyI don't get the thread headline at the risk of being whoosh fucked I really don't.
Ah right it's the aka that led me astray.Someone didn't know how to spell dempsey
Someone didn't know how to spell dempsey