Get to fuck! There was no luck involved. That was an incredible game where both teams played their part. Although I do have sympathy for the Kiwi's. They were outstanding. Ben Stokes...... Nothing more needs to be said 🙂Gutted for the Kiwis.
Poms rode their luck towards the end
Terrible terrible luck for the Kiwis. The Boult cath + the big deflection and the fact that they still tied it in the super over.
They just weren't meant to win it. The rules are retarded btw - most boundaries? Get the fuck out. It should be fewer wickets lost if anything.
In my mind Eng were done after the Sri Lanka loss.. India pretty much threw their match to make sure Pak didn't go through to the semis.
Which gave Eng momentum and took away India's.
Boult on the boundary was madness, he could have thrown it to the guy close to him and still it woudda been out, even drop it save the 6 pile the pressure.
The ball hitting bat and going for 4 was mental considering eng were staring down the barrel at that point.
On reflection I was thinking oh it was a draw even in the super 6, and no way fewer wickets gotta be most boundaries to make the game exciting
Far too much influence mate, and only because of money. It's ridiculous they started 2 weeks later.There's no doubt India seem to have too much power in the game, but that's another matter altogether.
It was harsh. If it deflected off the bat or batsmen it should be a dead ball imo.Another point - as per rules of the game, England shouldn't have been awarded 6 runs for the overthrow.
Batsmen hadn't crossed when the throw was made, hence only 1 run should have counted in addition to the 4.
A major fuck up by the umpires.
Atlas, I'm surprised a relatively sane chap believes that absolute crock of steaming bullshit. The Indians whinged like fuck after the game, complaining about the boundaries and shit. If you believe the Indians threw that game you're off your head.
I agree with that, and that rule may change after this. Stokes would not have taken the extra runs given the choice. I did see a response on BBC to the "one run extra" - stated that it is not when the throw is made, but when the cause of the overthrow occurs. The cause was the ball hitting Stokes, so 6 runs would be right.It was harsh. If it deflected off the bat or batsmen it should be a dead ball imo.
But who cares?
Its always the same shit ... we lost because we threw the game away. Typical from Indian and Pakistani supporters...its never coz they played shit or were beaten by a better team that day. Sick of it. I just wish all supporters were like us Bangladeshis...we are just happy when one of our batamen gets a bat on a ball !!! No runs but boy do we cheer "...He hit the ball Yeees !!!!"Atlas, I'm surprised a relatively sane chap believes that absolute crock of steaming bullshit. The Indians whinged like fuck after the game, complaining about the boundaries and shit. If you believe the Indians threw that game you're off your head.
FYI - my dad is a life long Pakistan supporter, he does not even beleive in the existence of Bangladesh. Strange but true, blames India for the breaking up, still thinks Pakistan are the dogs bollox, and just cant beleive it when they lose. But never ever thinks they threw away a game.I supported England throughout the tourney... As I've done for decades.
Admittedly I do have a soft spot for Pakistan and it's tough when they play each other.. but I'd pass the Tebbit test with flying colours.
I'd suggest Bangladesh are happy they hot bat on ball cos they are not that good?
We should be like that with Liverpool,just happy we turned up with 11 players even if we lost?
Hear the same argument from teams lower down .. oh I'd just be happy to be playing in the champions League. Like that should be the benchmark.
Pak didn't get through to the semi final cos they are unpredictable, inconsistent,unprofessional.