http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=777455&sec=transfers&cc=5901
This is starting to get eerie.
I don't have hope yet but if anyone would luck into the miraculous its the Senor.
City request permission to solve 'keeper crisis
- Thread starter MaBigTip
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=777455&sec=transfers&cc=5901
This is starting to get eerie.
I don't have hope yet but if anyone would luck into the miraculous its the Senor.
Is there no way Hart could be released by Brum?
If City are thinking about selling him in the summer and Brum want to buy him, it might do Brum no harm grease the wheels now and secure him at a knock down price. I'd be surprised if Hart wasn't in goal for City's next league game.
If City are thinking about selling him in the summer and Brum want to buy him, it might do Brum no harm grease the wheels now and secure him at a knock down price. I'd be surprised if Hart wasn't in goal for City's next league game.
On a side note, I know we have been shit but Joe Hart has had a better season than Pepe? Fuck right off.
And fuck these twats off, that is why you have a skwad. Did we ask to sign a striker after Torres was ruled out for the season, they have more keepers than we have strikers? Same principles, suck my balls.
And fuck these twats off, that is why you have a skwad. Did we ask to sign a striker after Torres was ruled out for the season, they have more keepers than we have strikers? Same principles, suck my balls.
Exactafuppinmundo.
[quote author=Loch Ness Monster link=topic=39950.msg1093579#msg1093579 date=1272296663]
On a side note, I know we have been shit but Joe Hart has had a better season than Pepe? Fuck right off.
And fuck these twats off, that is why you have a skwad. Did we ask to sign a striker after Torres was ruled out for the season, they have more keepers than we have strikers? Same principles, suck my balls.
[/quote]
Did we ask to sign Paul Jones for one month as emergency cover for our own goalkeeping crisis in 2004?
On a side note, I know we have been shit but Joe Hart has had a better season than Pepe? Fuck right off.
And fuck these twats off, that is why you have a skwad. Did we ask to sign a striker after Torres was ruled out for the season, they have more keepers than we have strikers? Same principles, suck my balls.
[/quote]
Did we ask to sign Paul Jones for one month as emergency cover for our own goalkeeping crisis in 2004?
Teams are more likely to get away with bending the rules with keepers though. But its the reserve keepers I tend to feel sorry for. Remember a few years back when Dudek and Kirkland (of course) we injured and Pegguy was out on loan? Luzi got half a game, clean sheet against Chelsea and then we went out and got Paul Jones on loan!
I doubt that was an emergency loan like this one but I did feel sorry for Luzi at the time.
I doubt that was an emergency loan like this one but I did feel sorry for Luzi at the time.
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39950.msg1093592#msg1093592 date=1272298811]
[quote author=Loch Ness Monster link=topic=39950.msg1093579#msg1093579 date=1272296663]
On a side note, I know we have been shit but Joe Hart has had a better season than Pepe? Fuck right off.
And fuck these twats off, that is why you have a skwad. Did we ask to sign a striker after Torres was ruled out for the season, they have more keepers than we have strikers? Same principles, suck my balls.
[/quote]
Did we ask to sign Paul Jones for one month as emergency cover for our own goalkeeping crisis in 2004?
[/quote]
Yeah, we did.
[quote author=Loch Ness Monster link=topic=39950.msg1093579#msg1093579 date=1272296663]
On a side note, I know we have been shit but Joe Hart has had a better season than Pepe? Fuck right off.
And fuck these twats off, that is why you have a skwad. Did we ask to sign a striker after Torres was ruled out for the season, they have more keepers than we have strikers? Same principles, suck my balls.
[/quote]
Did we ask to sign Paul Jones for one month as emergency cover for our own goalkeeping crisis in 2004?
[/quote]
Yeah, we did.
S
Squiggles
Guest
[quote author=Stulikesdrums link=topic=39950.msg1093575#msg1093575 date=1272296516]
Is there no way Hart could be released by Brum?
If City are thinking about selling him in the summer and Brum want to buy him, it might do Brum no harm grease the wheels now and secure him at a knock down price. I'd be surprised if Hart wasn't in goal for City's next league game.
[/quote] Stu, if they were contractually allowed to recall Hart they would have already done so, instead of taking this step.
Is there no way Hart could be released by Brum?
If City are thinking about selling him in the summer and Brum want to buy him, it might do Brum no harm grease the wheels now and secure him at a knock down price. I'd be surprised if Hart wasn't in goal for City's next league game.
[/quote] Stu, if they were contractually allowed to recall Hart they would have already done so, instead of taking this step.
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39950.msg1093592#msg1093592 date=1272298811]
[quote author=Loch Ness Monster link=topic=39950.msg1093579#msg1093579 date=1272296663]
On a side note, I know we have been shit but Joe Hart has had a better season than Pepe? Fuck right off.
And fuck these twats off, that is why you have a skwad. Did we ask to sign a striker after Torres was ruled out for the season, they have more keepers than we have strikers? Same principles, suck my balls.
[/quote]
Did we ask to sign Paul Jones for one month as emergency cover for our own goalkeeping crisis in 2004?
[/quote]
Yeah we did, when we had 2 x goalies injured. Shay Given picking up an injury is hardly a crisis though. They have pretty much had Given and Given alone all season, almost banking on the Premier League allowing them to do this should they require it through injury. We should sell all 436 of our reserve keepers, and then just do this if Pepe gets injured. we would save a fortune!
[quote author=Loch Ness Monster link=topic=39950.msg1093579#msg1093579 date=1272296663]
On a side note, I know we have been shit but Joe Hart has had a better season than Pepe? Fuck right off.
And fuck these twats off, that is why you have a skwad. Did we ask to sign a striker after Torres was ruled out for the season, they have more keepers than we have strikers? Same principles, suck my balls.
[/quote]
Did we ask to sign Paul Jones for one month as emergency cover for our own goalkeeping crisis in 2004?
[/quote]
Yeah we did, when we had 2 x goalies injured. Shay Given picking up an injury is hardly a crisis though. They have pretty much had Given and Given alone all season, almost banking on the Premier League allowing them to do this should they require it through injury. We should sell all 436 of our reserve keepers, and then just do this if Pepe gets injured. we would save a fortune!
They should play Taylor then. If he suddenly got injured, then fair enough. But they have a back up keeper.
[quote author=Loch Ness Monster link=topic=39950.msg1093612#msg1093612 date=1272303365]
They should play Taylor then. If he suddenly got injured, then fair enough. But they have a back up keeper.
[/quote]
'With Joe Hart unable to be recalled from his loan spell at Birmingham, where his performances saw him named in the PFA Premier League Team of the Year, and Stuart Taylor out injured, young Faroe Islands international Gunnar Nielsen is next in line for Roberto Mancini's side.'
The guy from the Faroe Islands is their only option so they don't have any option but to get somebody to act as cover for him or to take Given's place and have Nieslsen on the bench.
They should play Taylor then. If he suddenly got injured, then fair enough. But they have a back up keeper.
[/quote]
'With Joe Hart unable to be recalled from his loan spell at Birmingham, where his performances saw him named in the PFA Premier League Team of the Year, and Stuart Taylor out injured, young Faroe Islands international Gunnar Nielsen is next in line for Roberto Mancini's side.'
The guy from the Faroe Islands is their only option so they don't have any option but to get somebody to act as cover for him or to take Given's place and have Nieslsen on the bench.
So they'll be allowed to sign an emergency keeper, just like we did, and rightly so
Can anyone explain why people are moaning about this?
Can anyone explain why people are moaning about this?
[quote author=Richey link=topic=39950.msg1093620#msg1093620 date=1272304617]
I thought we signed Jones during a transfer window. Too lazy to check though.
[/quote]
January 2004.
But I think the transfer window didn't actually begin til the following season.
EDIT: I checked, the transfer window system was in place before then.
I thought we signed Jones during a transfer window. Too lazy to check though.
[/quote]
January 2004.
But I think the transfer window didn't actually begin til the following season.
EDIT: I checked, the transfer window system was in place before then.
They can have Itandje.
Where is he now anyway?
Where is he now anyway?
I suppose fair enough if Taylor is injured too, missed that bit in the article.
*Dreamy faceplam*
*Dreamy faceplam*
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39950.msg1093615#msg1093615 date=1272303901]
So they'll be allowed to sign an emergency keeper, just like we did, and rightly so
Can anyone explain why people are moaning about this?
[/quote]
because no-one is bothering to read the article?
So they'll be allowed to sign an emergency keeper, just like we did, and rightly so
Can anyone explain why people are moaning about this?
[/quote]
because no-one is bothering to read the article?
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=39950.msg1093603#msg1093603 date=1272300567]
[quote author=Stulikesdrums link=topic=39950.msg1093575#msg1093575 date=1272296516]
Is there no way Hart could be released by Brum?
If City are thinking about selling him in the summer and Brum want to buy him, it might do Brum no harm grease the wheels now and secure him at a knock down price. I'd be surprised if Hart wasn't in goal for City's next league game.
[/quote] Stu, if they were contractually allowed to recall Hart they would have already done so, instead of taking this step.
[/quote]Yeah, I know there is nothing City can do. But if Brum were to cancel the deal or instigate a mutually beneficial agreement between the clubs, Brum could do well out of it, long term. Wheyher
it be securing another loan deal or perhaps a permanent transfer.
Or is it a case that the players registration cannot be changed outside of the window regardless.
[quote author=Stulikesdrums link=topic=39950.msg1093575#msg1093575 date=1272296516]
Is there no way Hart could be released by Brum?
If City are thinking about selling him in the summer and Brum want to buy him, it might do Brum no harm grease the wheels now and secure him at a knock down price. I'd be surprised if Hart wasn't in goal for City's next league game.
[/quote] Stu, if they were contractually allowed to recall Hart they would have already done so, instead of taking this step.
[/quote]Yeah, I know there is nothing City can do. But if Brum were to cancel the deal or instigate a mutually beneficial agreement between the clubs, Brum could do well out of it, long term. Wheyher
it be securing another loan deal or perhaps a permanent transfer.
Or is it a case that the players registration cannot be changed outside of the window regardless.
[quote author=Richey link=topic=39950.msg1093593#msg1093593 date=1272299204]
Teams are more likely to get away with bending the rules with keepers though. But its the reserve keepers I tend to feel sorry for. Remember a few years back when Dudek and Kirkland (of course) we injured and Pegguy was out on loan? Luzi got half a game, clean sheet against Chelsea and then we went out and got Paul Jones on loan!
I doubt that was an emergency loan like this one but I did feel sorry for Luzi at the time.
[/quote]
He made one woeful punch in that game if I remember correctly. Anyway I know we did it, but emergency loans are gash. It should be the same for all positions.
Teams are more likely to get away with bending the rules with keepers though. But its the reserve keepers I tend to feel sorry for. Remember a few years back when Dudek and Kirkland (of course) we injured and Pegguy was out on loan? Luzi got half a game, clean sheet against Chelsea and then we went out and got Paul Jones on loan!
I doubt that was an emergency loan like this one but I did feel sorry for Luzi at the time.
[/quote]
He made one woeful punch in that game if I remember correctly. Anyway I know we did it, but emergency loans are gash. It should be the same for all positions.
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=39950.msg1093631#msg1093631 date=1272308580]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39950.msg1093615#msg1093615 date=1272303901]
So they'll be allowed to sign an emergency keeper, just like we did, and rightly so
Can anyone explain why people are moaning about this?
[/quote]
because no-one is bothering to read the article?
[/quote]
No, because (young or not) their third keeper has played international football and can hardly be said to be a footballing babe-in-arms.
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39950.msg1093615#msg1093615 date=1272303901]
So they'll be allowed to sign an emergency keeper, just like we did, and rightly so
Can anyone explain why people are moaning about this?
[/quote]
because no-one is bothering to read the article?
[/quote]
No, because (young or not) their third keeper has played international football and can hardly be said to be a footballing babe-in-arms.
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=39950.msg1093649#msg1093649 date=1272311836]
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=39950.msg1093631#msg1093631 date=1272308580]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39950.msg1093615#msg1093615 date=1272303901]
So they'll be allowed to sign an emergency keeper, just like we did, and rightly so
Can anyone explain why people are moaning about this?
[/quote]
because no-one is bothering to read the article?
[/quote]
No, because (young or not) their third keeper has played international football and can hardly be said to be a footballing babe-in-arms.
[/quote]
Nope, because it's Manchester City, the richest club in world football, and it's both hilarious and ironic that their squad should prove not deep enough at a crucial moment in the season. Particularly as it gives us a (very) faint hope of finishing above them.
[quote author=Buddha link=topic=39950.msg1093631#msg1093631 date=1272308580]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=39950.msg1093615#msg1093615 date=1272303901]
So they'll be allowed to sign an emergency keeper, just like we did, and rightly so
Can anyone explain why people are moaning about this?
[/quote]
because no-one is bothering to read the article?
[/quote]
No, because (young or not) their third keeper has played international football and can hardly be said to be a footballing babe-in-arms.
[/quote]
Nope, because it's Manchester City, the richest club in world football, and it's both hilarious and ironic that their squad should prove not deep enough at a crucial moment in the season. Particularly as it gives us a (very) faint hope of finishing above them.
Rafa was onto something then when he bought his 57 goalkeepers
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=39950.msg1093664#msg1093664 date=1272314022]
Rafa was onto something then when he bought his 57 goalkeepers
[/quote]
I think he must have thought swine flu would hit the squad quite hard with numerous fatalities.
Rafa was onto something then when he bought his 57 goalkeepers
[/quote]
I think he must have thought swine flu would hit the squad quite hard with numerous fatalities.
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=39950.msg1093664#msg1093664 date=1272314022]
Rafa was onto something then when he bought his 57 goalkeepers
[/quote]
We should loan them one or two. I'm sure they're probably rubbish anyways.
Rafa was onto something then when he bought his 57 goalkeepers
[/quote]
We should loan them one or two. I'm sure they're probably rubbish anyways.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
