Barely seems credible that we have wages in the same order of magnitude as City and United.
Does anyone recall a news story about any city player being unhappy with their wages/contract in the last 10 or so years?
Just another advantage Guardiola enjoys
I can't remember why Sane left; but he was probably the most high profile departure for seemingly no reason
I've no doubt that Chelsea and City are hiding payments offshore.
I've no doubt that Chelsea and City are hiding payments offshore.
Does anyone recall a news story about any city player being unhappy with their wages/contract in the last 10 or so years?
Just another advantage Guardiola enjoys
Reportedly 35m Euros with 5m in add-ons is being submitted by Bayern and we will likely accept.
I think we'd sell regardless. FSG are unlikely to let both Salah and Mane leave for nothing. At least we can recoup what we paid for Sadio and put it towards a new attacker.If we’re accepting, I hope that means we have another forward in the bag.
Leao has had an impressive season with AC Milan.
Yeah I remember the lovely Kante saying he didn't want paying using tax loop holes that Chelsea had suggested to him. He just wanted to be paid the regular way. You know full in that this is the tip of the iceberg.I've no doubt that Chelsea and City are hiding payments offshore.
I think that was probably about image rights.Yeah I remember the lovely Kante saying he didn't want paying using tax loop holes that Chelsea had suggested to him. He just wanted to be paid the regular way. You know full in that this is the tip of the iceberg.
I think that was probably about image rights.
There was a suggestion that City had done some "off balance sheet" planning on image rights to move the costs out of the Club's accounts, but to my knowledge everyone else puts them through their own books and they would normally go through wages. The bit Kante was likely unhappy about was that it is seen as tax avoidance (legal but ethically questionable), as opposed to evasion (illegal). Although obviously that depends on the views of the tax authorities - the Spanish tax authorities seem to view it as evasion, but the UK authorities don't.
I don't think Chelsea would be understating their wages on that count (although using image rights would save them a bit of cash as they are not subject to national insurance (social security) and similar levies).
What Chelsea MIGHT have done is net loan fees off their wage bill, rather than disclosing gross wages paid and then showing loan fees separately within income. There's an argument for either treatment in the accounts and that isn't especially controversial. My personal view is that, to the extent the loan fee offsets wages, it ought to be netted off with any excess shown as income. Not sure what we do, but obviously with the number of players Chelsea have out on loan at any point in time that could make a big difference to their overall wage bill.
As a separate point, I'm happy to do a nerdy explanation of how image rights work if anyone wants it - let me know.
I'll pop something up tomorrow.Yes please re. Image rights.
I'll pop something up tomorrow.
I'll take Musiala instead of Gnabry 😛