Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
It only matters what you plead before the court under penalty of perjury. I'm no slouch of a lawyer, and I can't even begin to formulate a line of questioning for the prosecution based on some empty ring binders. What the hell are they planning to ask?
Prosecutor: I put it to you that those empty binders contained illegal documents.
Big D: No.
Prosecutor:
Prosecutor: I put it to you that those empty binders contained illegal documents.
Big D: No.
Prosecutor:
[article]
The fact we now know there were highly classified, restricted access documents about another country’s nuclear defense capabilities stored at Mar-a-Lago is a gamechanger with regard to the risk it poses to our national security.
That these documents may have been seen by unauthorized personnel … tells individuals what our capabilities are with regard to intelligence collection related to nuclear programs.
More important is it identifies or exposes our gaps with regard to intelligence collection.
The bottom line is others are going to look at this information and determine what we know and don’t know, and they’re going to make decisions about their nuclear programs based on that information. And that is an extremely dangerous thing.
[/article]
But where is Biden’s laptop?
The fact we now know there were highly classified, restricted access documents about another country’s nuclear defense capabilities stored at Mar-a-Lago is a gamechanger with regard to the risk it poses to our national security.
That these documents may have been seen by unauthorized personnel … tells individuals what our capabilities are with regard to intelligence collection related to nuclear programs.
More important is it identifies or exposes our gaps with regard to intelligence collection.
The bottom line is others are going to look at this information and determine what we know and don’t know, and they’re going to make decisions about their nuclear programs based on that information. And that is an extremely dangerous thing.
[/article]
But where is Biden’s laptop?
So lots of people whose job it was to know this stuff knew this stuff. Yet it still happened?
Isn’t that how stuff usually works with things like this?
Financial crisis, Covid, Ukraine.
There was a slow gradual buildup to it before then including all the lack of intel sharing between agencies.
Check out Looming Tower on Prime, great show.
Not sure they are comparable?
Knowing a pandemic is likely means you attempt to prepare and take policy measures to get ready.
Financial crisis seems a handful of people know and they couldn't do much to stop or get ready for it.
The suggestion here is it was so well known even a retard like Trump knew.. yet we couldn't do anything to stop three planes flying into various buildings?
Wasn’t just handful of people in the know though.
Financial crisis for e.g. was on the radar for anyone whom was in investment banks a year before. The sub prime fall out was with the company I was with in 2007/08. Yet CDS were still hot.
Peope knew but most ignored it for a few reasons. My point is a lot of big man made crisis were pre warned a whils before but still ignored for reasons by those that could do somethinv about it.
I don’t agree with the suggestion Trump knew more about it this than others, he just loves going on about more about certain this than others to a fan base more than others. CIA and FBI knew and they were the ones who could have immediately acted
They are similar, the pandemic, the financial crisis, the twin towers, in all these cases the people making money underestimated the risk of an adverse event. It probably wasn't malicious, or out of corruption, or greed, or out of not caring, it's just because they used mathematical models that fit the data, instead of using mathematical models that make falsifiable predictions. Then you end up with stupid answers like the chance of a terrorist attack is 0.0000000000134% instead of 7.4% +/- 0.5%. When you blindly fit your model to the data, your model is absolutely positively wrong no ifs or buts about it. When you predict things that are subsequently verified by experiment, your model is almost certainly a true reflection of the real world.
Humans never learn this lesson no matter how many times they get slapped in the face with a crisis. I assume because they never paid attention in university, got old, then randomly decided they wanted to act like scientists and use "evidence based models" when it's far too late and they're far too lacking in intelligence to understand what they're doing.
Humans never learn this lesson no matter how many times they get slapped in the face with a crisis. I assume because they never paid attention in university, got old, then randomly decided they wanted to act like scientists and use "evidence based models" when it's far too late and they're far too lacking in intelligence to understand what they're doing.
I'm no fan of Biden but mocking an old man for this is just sad.
I genuinely feel bad for him when this shit happens ...
It’s ok, he can still put his pants on the right way round and doesn’t need to wear a man-nappy yet
This shit doesn't just happen though. He has dementia, or a similar degenerative disease, and it was obvious he had it during the election campaign. His voters who denied it with frothing outrage are actually the ones being mocked. His family and his handlers are the ones responsible, and they deserve the growing humiliation they must feel upon carrying on this weekend at bernie's shitshow. Biden himself is no longer with us to even be mocked.
The difference in this case is that this doddering shell of a man is President of the United States and therefore the most powerful man in the world. In that position he's fair game unfortunately, plus I would argue that there's a worldwide public interest in pointing out just how frail, both physically and mentally, he really is.
Where I differ from dantes is on the question of Biden's backers. Their putting this poor husk of a man into office was a big "F*** You" to everyone else in the first place and I don't believe they'll feel the least bit humiliated by how he's performed since. Their stalking-horse is in the White House and that's all they care about.
Last edited:
It’s not as if the US public were spoilt for choice in either thd 2020 election or the 2016, including their Primary’s.
Has their been a time when there’s been a bigger collection of muppets at the top of the American greasy pole - I’m sure there’s talented and good politicians out there - but fuck knows how they get into serious positions of influence.
It’s not just a US problem either.
That's what someone who made a comically stupid choice would say after the fact, to pretend to themselves they're not clowns who are hopelessly detached from reality. The choice was straight forward and very easy. The result of getting that easy decision wrong because you suffered an emotional reaction to the candidate's personalities is very obviously proving to be fatal for millions of people. Blood on their hands and that's all there is to it. Whining that you didn't have a nice candidate who smiled with shiny white teeth and kissed rather than sniffed babies isn't a good coping strategy.
Perhaps reading about a woke attorney suing Trump for fraud because they disagreed with his valuation of an asset lol, that might make people feel better temporarily. Only because they know nothing about the law or valuation, they're definitely detached from those realities, so yes they can blissfully tell themselves he's going to get punished because that's what they really need to happen, in order to make believe that they didn't fuck up like a bunch of hapless woke idiots.
Perhaps reading about a woke attorney suing Trump for fraud because they disagreed with his valuation of an asset lol, that might make people feel better temporarily. Only because they know nothing about the law or valuation, they're definitely detached from those realities, so yes they can blissfully tell themselves he's going to get punished because that's what they really need to happen, in order to make believe that they didn't fuck up like a bunch of hapless woke idiots.
And what, pray tell, is the “comically stupid choice” I made?
Whats’s a “woke” attorney- one that’s aware of the law, feels like that might be useful?
If what you’re taking from your hero’s latest legal peril is “they disagreed with his valuation of an asset”, they you’re even dumber than I previously thought.
Actually, no, you’re no dumb - you’re just a fictional internet character someone’s taking amusement out of “playing” on the internet, amongst other things.
I hope you’re getting what you need out of it.
Whats’s a “woke” attorney- one that’s aware of the law, feels like that might be useful?
If what you’re taking from your hero’s latest legal peril is “they disagreed with his valuation of an asset”, they you’re even dumber than I previously thought.
Actually, no, you’re no dumb - you’re just a fictional internet character someone’s taking amusement out of “playing” on the internet, amongst other things.
I hope you’re getting what you need out of it.
Her case rests on the claim that Trump overvalued his properties. Let's use an analogy you might understand. Imagine you sued John Henry for overvaluing Darwin Nunez, do you understand how that court case will go for you? Even that would be a stronger case than the legal peril you've been fooled into thinking has befallen Trump.
Similar threads
- Locked
