I mean Sadio and Wijnaldum seemed to be coping just fine. Salah too.Does anyone last in a Klopp team more than 5 years without turning into a shrivelled, injury ridden husk anyway?
I mean Sadio and Wijnaldum seemed to be coping just fine. Salah too.
That is not how we roll. We probably will let him leave for free at the end of his contract to Madrid or PSG in 5 years.
They both sustained their injuries as a result of bad/unfortunate challenges.Both curiously injured as we speak...
As has been said, so what? At worst we'd get our money back. But if Klopp is still here I'd bet, like Mo, VvD, Ali etc. he wouldn't want to move on, even more so if we were winning trophies. He's English not Latin so should be very at home at Anfield.The biggest issue with Bellingham for me, aside from the fact his price seems unrealistic, is that he's clearly a career project type player. By that I mean he and his advisers/family have mapped out how they want his career to go. There's a reason he went to Dortmund at 17 when every club in Europe wanted him. Much like Haaland and Mbappe he's going to move as and when he sees fit to maximize his career/earnings. My fear is we'd pay an astronomical fee and he'd be off to Madrid or PSG within 3 years.
If he leaves in 3 years we will not be losing any money on him, and we’d have had one of the best young midfielders around during that period to help us win trophies.
And if he’s got PSG as a part of his elaborate career map at 22, god help him.
we inherited some dosh?
You're making an awful lot of assumptions based on a 19 year-old's single transfer at 17.Not suggesting we would lose money on him. But if you are planning to rebuild your midfield for the long term then a guy who is likely to start assessing his options in 2 seasons is not the player to build around. I see people saying 'if we sign Jude we'd be sorted for 10 years' but the reality is he's very unlikely to stay put that long.
Is Jude twice as good?
No need to overspend, though. That’s always been my issue not that he’s of good.Well that's irrelevant since Tchouameni isn't on the table.
So what is the alternative to Bellingham? Enzo + Amrabat + Joao Gomes?
We ended paying that because of tapping up— he was going to be cheaper.Virgil may not be precisely twice as good as some of the other options who would have cost half as much, but it was still money well spent.
The biggest issue with Bellingham for me, aside from the fact his price seems unrealistic, is that he's clearly a career project type player. By that I mean he and his advisers/family have mapped out how they want his career to go. There's a reason he went to Dortmund at 17 when every club in Europe wanted him. Much like Haaland and Mbappe he's going to move as and when he sees fit to maximize his career/earnings. My fear is we'd pay an astronomical fee and he'd be off to Madrid or PSG within 3 years.
A lot of BS speculation there. If he comes, enjoys his football, and we pay him appropriately, it is remotely possible that he might stay for a while.
I trust your yoga hombre.Put it this way - I’d be staggered and gutted if he didn’t become a red in the summer. Everything I’ve been told - repeatedly by my Yoga hombre points to the fact that he’s a nailed on red. Everything. Player, Parents, agent, both clubs everything is set. Dortmund aren’t cunts. The relationship with Klopp is key here. Sure his value could and probably will rocket BUT for what it’s worth - He’s given his word and so if it does fuck up it’ll likely be us not him that scuppers the deal. I’m confident.
Well that's irrelevant since Tchouameni isn't on the table.
So what is the alternative to Bellingham? Enzo + Amrabat + Joao Gomes?
It was agreed last summer.Of course we won't get Bellingham in January.
We'll get him in the summer.
It was agreed last summer.