I know I sound like a broken record, but if you can say that City isn't the same "City" from last season, despite the treble, are we the same team or better than the ones who finished 2nd twice?
Interesting question, player for player we are actually more technically gifted, and have a larger squad than those seasons when we came 2nd. We find ourselves in this position because we have an entirely new midfield, and an attack that is adjusting itself to life without Bobby. We have both a front line and a midfield that can create those match winning moments now.
When you look at City, they have actually lost clutch players that have contributed to many goals, and life without Gundo who has been the consistent presence in their midfield since Pep started winning the PL. They don't have a single player in midfield that matches what he did for them. Also on the right - they don't have a Mahrez but Foden is doing well. Also, I know they won a treble last season and its silly for me to say they did not play well, but that was a fucking easy treble for them. They had no challengers in the league - it was Arsenal's Rodgers season to use a comparison but they bottled it big time. I think the biggest problem Pep faces is:
1) more ball playing less afraid teams in the PL
2) the quality of players to replace the likes of Gundo, Mahrez is just not available on the market for him. Therefore I don't expect the same level of consistency.
3) KDB - he's what 32 now ? the way he plays, I have doubts he is going to be the same type of player he has been in previous seasons.