• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Andrew Cole: Liverpool are a spent force

Status
Not open for further replies.

King Binny

Part of the Furniture
Honorary Member
Liverpool were the top dogs of English football when I was growing up in the 1970s and 1980s. They were still the best when I started playing professionally in the early 1990s; to play for Liverpool was to reach the very top. They won the most trophies and they paid the best wages. When my friend Michael Thomas - the man who won the league for Arsenal at Anfield in such dramatic circumstances in 1989 - was having contract negotiations at Arsenal, Liverpool offered to pay him £5,000 (Dh29,700) a week. That blew every other English club out of the water and he moved north.

Even when I played for a Manchester United side who won everything, the dressing room talk was of Liverpool and trying to surpass what they'd achieved. Liverpool had set the records that needed to be broken.

Liverpool stayed a top four side until 2009. Since, they have finished seventh, sixth and eighth. They did very well in Europe under Rafa Benitez and won the Champions League in 2005. They also had a great chance to win the Premier League in 2009 and beat eventual champions United 4-1 at Old Trafford, before Benitez suddenly made his side more defensive.

He was gone a year later, replaced by the current England manager Roy Hodgson who lasted months and was ridiculed. He was replaced by Kenny Dalglish after a clamour from fans desperate for success. The fans were wrong. They associated Dalglish with past triumphs, but football had changed and Dalglish was exposed tactically.

Liverpool didn't cover themselves with glory for the way they handled the Luis Suarez/Patrice Evra race affair, and Dalglish was dismissed after just over a year, another change, another sign of the instability and turmoil at Anfield.

With continued changes off the pitch from the owners to all the key personnel behind the scenes, Liverpool lost all the stability they had been famed for. Managers need time; none of them got it.

The messages coming from the club in the last few years were mixed too - a classic sign that nobody is in charge and people are falling out behind the scenes. Such a situation would have been unimaginable at Anfield years ago.

Liverpool are currently 18th in the table without a win from their first three matches. They have scored just two goals and conceded seven, though they have played some very good football and the results have been less than fair.

They have a new manager, Brendan Rodgers, someone I like for what he did at Swansea, but will he get the time he needs? He appeared to have been messed around in the transfer window when Andy Carroll was allowed to leave and targets like Clint Dempsey were not brought in. That's worrying for Liverpool if it's a sign of things to come.

Liverpool should rise up the table, but they will do well to finish in the top six. Their rivals are now Everton, not the Manchester clubs.

Slipping out of the Champions League makes it very difficult for Liverpool to attract the top-class players they have been used to. The likes of Fernando Torres, Pepe Reina and Xabi Alonso would not come to Liverpool now. Reina is still at the club, but the stars around him are fading.

Steven Gerard, the captain, remains a fantastic player, the best midfielder in the England national side by a distance. He's a far superior player to Frank Lampard. He's carried Liverpool for years and still has the talent to do so, but he's 32 and will fade soon. Jamie Carragher, one of the best centre halves in football and always honest when he speaks about Liverpool, is 34 and now more peripheral.

Luis Suarez aside, I don't see the quality there. With others clubs like Chelsea and Manchester City able to outspend Liverpool, they're slipping further and I'm not confident that they will be able to become Champions League regulars again. Manchester United and Arsenal attract average crowds of 76,000 and 60,000, giving them far bigger revenues than Liverpool, who, for all the talk of a move, are still in an Anfield with 44,000 seats. City and Chelsea have owners who can outspend Liverpool's new American bosses, so it's now almost impossible for Liverpool to break into that top four and play in a European competition they've won five times - more than any other British club.

Frequent managerial changes means frequent player changes and Liverpool have simply not spent well. Carroll, a good player, was not worth £35m, and the fee added to the pressure he was under. I know; I've been there.

The costly Jordan Henderson, Joe Cole and Charlie Adam didn't work out either. Liverpool fans may think differently, but I'm not optimistic about the future of their club.
 
Pundits keep slating the club and saying it's doing badly, and then ask 'will Rodgers get enough time?'. If they think he OUGHT to get enough time, maybe it would make more sense for them to back off and wait before making such a big issue of a few results. Talk about wanting your cake and eating it.
 
Pundits keep slating the club and saying it's doing badly, and then ask 'will Rodgers get enough time?'. If they think he OUGHT to get enough time, maybe it would make more sense for them to back off and wait before making such a big issue of a few results. Talk about wanting your cake and eating it.

The truth of the matter is that they couldn't give a stuff about "ought". Doommongering generates copy sells papers.
 
I'm more shocked about the state and quality of these pundits they roll out.
Cole, Merson, Burley, Townsend, Rosenior, Dowie. The list is endless and they're all fucking shite.

Iain Dowie giving managerial advice is just mental to listen to.
 
He mentioned absolutely everything there, well all apart from how our strikers squander numerous chances before managing to score.
 
He mentioned absolutely everything there, well all apart from how our strikers squander numerous chances before managing to score.

Yes he did - truth hurts for a lot of people on here, but it is the truth. Although we are still a big club world-wide and I refuse to believe it is the end of the story for us.
 
To be fair, if his writing were anything like his shooting, his points might be ten articles in the making. He's finally got it right on his first chance.
 
Is this from him or extracts from a ghost written book ? Can't really see Andrew using so many figures otherwise .
 
He didnt write a word of it. All of it is true however.
I was about to write exactly the same thing. I can just see him sitting on his laptop typing that. Never wrote a word of it. Asked some leading questions by a journalist. Said journalist then cobbled it all together to form a narrative. Editor gives it a headline.
Sadly the sentiments in the article are spot on. Having said that there is nothing new in there, nothing we didn't already know and it's utterly pointless.
 
I was about to write exactly the same thing. I can just see him sitting on his laptop typing that. Never wrote a word of it. Asked some leading questions by a journalist. Said journalist then cobbled it all together to form a narrative. Editor gives it a headline.
Sadly the sentiments in the article are spot on. Having said that there is nothing new in there, nothing we didn't already know and it's utterly pointless.


I'm guessing this European Football Correspondent is the same Utd-supporting Andy Mitten that created the United We Stand fanzine. He'll have loved writing that column.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom