• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

5 subs revisited - your take?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know there are well intentioned and important reasons for this but i just can’t shake the feeling it’s another advantage to City when they’re naming a bench that cost £350m on the first day of the season.
So disadvantage all players because City are oil rich pricks?
 
Yeah, I've been calling for that for years.
Problem is, if that clock is implemented we don't see Alisson scoring a goal in added time.
The game would be stopped in the middle of a last minute attack.
Small price. It’s absolutely the fairest and best way to do it.
 
I'd go along with it as long as the rule is that the additional 2 players must be homegrown. That way you prevent it from blatantly being used by teams who stockpile talent, it would level the playing field a bit more and encourage clubs to keep a healthy supply of homegrown talent on their books.
 
Yeah, I've been calling for that for years.
Problem is, if that clock is implemented we don't see Alisson scoring a goal in added time.
The game would be stopped in the middle of a last minute attack.

How many mins would be on the clock. The average game must only have the ball in play for about 60 mins
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom