I'm getting the impression it has reached some of them but they deliberately ignored it.I'm starting to get the impression that this news hasn't reached as many people as I would have thought.

I'm getting the impression it has reached some of them but they deliberately ignored it.I'm starting to get the impression that this news hasn't reached as many people as I would have thought.
It isn't lazy categorisation and nowhere did I say 'all black people' or 'all Asian people' etc. Although we know for a fact black people are more susceptible to certain diseases, ditto Asian people and white people the same so it's impossible to just disregard these genetic adaptations likewise we can't simply categorise all people simply by skin colour.It doesn't follow though. Sherpas are a race. Black people are not a race in the same sense. The mechanism you are giving an example of is exactly why it's stupid to talk about black people as a race. Or genetics using terms like Asian, black or white, that have no genetic meaning.
People keep bringing up these fascinating specific cases as though they are the same as saying black people are more athletic, and I'm honestly agog at it. If I looked at that piece of genetic adaptation and said "Asians are the best climbers" as though if I picked some random Japanese person to develop into a climber, I'd have a great advantage, you would think I was fucking stupid. They aren't even the same people you'd say, if even remotely aware.
You've got Sherpas in Nepal inheriting a gene that had Darwinian selection over many generations from Tibetan ancestors. In that scenario you have a studied population with shared characteristics, a specific, relatively homogenous population, in a specific place. And then, you have evidence! There's a sensible causal connection there. Science!
Interestingly it does seem some people in the Andes do have genetic adaptions to high altitudes, from what I've just read, just not the same ones. Again, if you were to use lazy categories of race most people in the West don't even disambiguate the indigenous populations in these areas from the populations post colonization. Similarly, the question of who is black, and even more so, who is white, has had many shifting answers depending on time and place.
There are all sorts of advantages specific populations can have at doing very specific things that are studied. None of those populations are defined by cultural descriptors of race that have never had any scientific basis, or even any consistency of application.
Read the whole thread, so you know what the context of the posts are, or do yourself a favour and don't actually. It's been a colossal fucking waste of time.It isn't lazy categorisation and nowhere did I say 'all black people' or 'all Asian people' etc. Although we know for a fact black people are more susceptible to certain diseases, ditto Asian people and white people the same so it's impossible to just disregard these genetic adaptations likewise we can't simply categorise all people simply by skin colour.
In fact if you read my post again I didn't say anything of the sort and I specifically stated regional adaptations.
It isn't lazy categorisation and nowhere did I say 'all black people' or 'all Asian people' etc. Although we know for a fact black people are more susceptible to certain diseases, ditto Asian people and white people the same so it's impossible to just disregard these genetic adaptations likewise we can't simply categorise all people simply by skin colour.
In fact if you read my post again I didn't say anything of the sort and I specifically stated regional adaptations.
Don't know if the same now but I went to a grammar school on the Wirral - do they even exist any more?
All the grammar school children played a mixture of rugby, cricket and hockey. All the secondary schools played football.
Not sure what the mix is like in London but I got the feeling that rugby was really popular in the North West (both codes).
I lived in Africa for 5 years and have been in Asia for 30 years, so I'm well aware.But “Black,” “Asian,” “White” aren’t genetic categories. They’re social shorthand that lump together massively diverse populations. Africa has the highest genetic diversity on earth; two “Black” people from Nigeria and Ethiopia can be more genetically different from each other than either is from a European. Saying “Black people have X adaptation” is like saying “Asians are good climbers”. It collapses hundreds of distinct populations into a lazy label.
So sure, regional adaptations are real. But that doesn’t validate talking about race as if it’s a meaningful genetic unit. It’s precisely the opposite.
I lived in Africa for 5 years and have been in Asia for 30 years, so I'm well aware.
And nowhere did I state anything of the sort. My point was that regional adaptations could indeed favour certain people (who are almost always of the same colour / race in that region) with genetic 'enhancements' and since these take many generations to develop they could indeed be transported to other regions.
I find it strange and naive to ignore this possibility.
Funny enough, Thelo in Greek means I want.
So his name is "I want an arse guard" ... bloody homophobeFunny enough, Thelo in Greek means I want.
He was let go as a yoot. Having seen him play a few times, definitely not good enough.
Yeah, I just thought it was funny seeing a Norwegian Scouser.He was let go as a yoot. Having seen him play a few times, definitely not good enough.
Yeah, where there are 25 million people within the m25
Not quite. But within 30 miles of Westminster for sure.Yeah, where there are 25 million people within the m25
In terms of adding British/HG players to the team I'd be interested in following the trajectory of Elliott Anderson. Been really impressive so far.
This is from the gov.uk site:The vast majority of whom are white.
This is from the gov.uk site:
- according to the 2021 Census, London was the most ethnically diverse region in England and Wales
- out of all regions, London had the smallest percentage of people who identified as white British, and the North East and Wales had the largest percentage
- more white people lived in the South East than anywhere else, and more people from the black, Asian, mixed and ‘other’ ethnic groups lived in London than anywhere else
- Newham in London was the most ethnically diverse of all local authorities in England and Wales
Oh. Is that why it is called the M25?Yeah, where there are 25 million people within the m25
The actual Chelsea academy has about 2000 kids on their books. Almost like satellite club model, massive con for parents but good earner I hear for club. None of them are ever likely to play much for Chelsea regardless.West Ham - academy
Chelsea - academy
Arsenal - academy
Palace - rejects from West Ham, Chelsea and Arsenal academies.
