[quote author=Pesam link=topic=40815.msg1129864#msg1129864 date=1278058505]
[quote author=doctor_mac link=topic=40815.msg1129844#msg1129844 date=1278056743]
[quote author=Pesam link=topic=40815.msg1129840#msg1129840 date=1278056407]
[quote author=doctor_mac link=topic=40815.msg1129833#msg1129833 date=1278055759]
Steve Nicol was the best from that lot, despite it being a high quality lineup. Fantastic defender who got forward with purpose, and scored more than a FB had a right to.
[/quote]
I just checked his scoring ratio against that of Chris Lawler because I figured Chrissy was even more prolific - their records were remarkably similar, averaging a goal every 9-10 games during their careers for us (even more remarkable given that neither took penalties).
[/quote]
I don't remember Lawler mate, but if he was on a par with Nicol he must have been a top player.
[/quote]
IMO Doc he was as good as Nicol defensively but better going forward. I have been looking for that "100 players who shook the Kop" link to post the Chris Lawler video but have failed to locate it as yet.
[/quote]
I don't agree that he was better than Stevie Nicol going forward. In fact I'd say the opposite if anything. Lawler was dangerous in the box but Nicol had that AND laid on lots for others with his overlapping.
Nicol did play more often at RB but I'd pick him at LB (where he also played a fair bit) to make sure he got in the side. My vote for RB is a toss-up between Markus Babbel and Rob Jones, and Babbel edges it for his goals. I understand the point about them not having played for us for that long, but I don't agree with it. IMO votes like this should be decided on innate talent, not the length of a player's career, which can be affected by so many other things outside his control.