• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

The Loan System

Status
Not open for further replies.

Frogfish

Gone to Redcafe
Member
And this is what's wrong with it. Hardly worth a thread but I thought some here might be interested.

Metaj Delac is Chelsea's longest serving current player (apparently) and has never made a first team appearance
http://www.goal.com/en/news/1862/pr...s-longest-serving-player-who-has-never-played

They also have the following players who arent involved in the first team :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_F.C.#Other_players_under_contract

There's also Lucas Piazon who is heading out for his 7th year on loan and Mario Pasalic is heading out for his 4th.
 
Calmly waiting for that one season they suddenly turn world class.
They've apparently learned their lesson after Matic and DeBruyne
 
There should be limits on squad size. These players are singing for Chelsea with no real hope of ever playing for them. Who was the last City or Chelsea player to break through from the youth team?
 
Bigger clubs: sign up young players, hope to strike gold, even for those who can't breakthrough, majority/most can be sold for decent fee - more or less generating revenue to fund/cover relevant costs in this 'project'

Smaller clubs: just having to pay wage contribution (or perhaps even no cost involved at all), chance of signing player permanently should he fail to make it at parent club (rapport/relationship might have been struck), chance to enhance reputation with regard to player development - increased opportunities in signing good young players and/or loan talented youngsters from more clubs.

Player: sign for big club in hope of making it, safe with the knowledge that they will get proper footballing education and/or loan moves which will earn them opportunities to move on to good/decent clubs

stl01.png


Bertrand Traore for example: Auxerre - signed for Chelsea as teenager - loan stints at Vitesse and Ajax - joins Lyon for €10m

Even for less successful examples like van Ginkel, he still get to join PSV on loan for a 3rd time this season. And 'interestingly', 23 yr old Lucas Piazon (ex Málaga, Vitesse, Eintracht Frankfurt, Reading loanee) signed a 2 yr extension before joining Fulham on loan for a 2nd consecutive season. Pretty obvious its aimed at allowing Chelsea to earn a decent fee when he eventually moves on.

It's not just Chelsea and Man City. Juventus have been at it for a long time too - loans + co-ownership deals.

[article]Dated 2015 http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/row-zed/juventus-fifty-eight-players-out-6659215

[/article]
 
Last edited:
Chelsea are taking the mickey out of a loan system that is a slight on the Premier League's integrity
[article]These Chelsea-players-for-hire are becoming pretty good at making career announcements.

If they don’t do it, Chelsea will do it for them.

Here’s an official club shout from the same day as Tammy Abraham expressed his delight at getting a pay rise, and having to do a year’s work experience in Wales.

Chelsea FC: “Congratulations to @kaseypalmer45 who has also signed a new deal and will continue his development at Huddersfield.”

Ah, good old Huddersfield Town, the first English team to win three successive titles, now a very useful place for a Chelsea lad to “continue his development”.

They are ‘developing’ all over the Premier League. Abraham at Swansea, Kasey Palmer at Huddersfield, Kurt Zouma at Stoke City and Ruben Loftus-Cheek at Crystal Palace.

To be fair to Loftus-Cheek, whose new five-year deal with Chelsea was signed earlier this year, he did not get into any developmental nonsense.

“I had the option of coming to Palace and I thought that it would be great for me. I live not too far away.” Perfect, then.

Chelsea are not just making use of a loan system that is a slight on the competition’s integrity, they are taking the mickey out of it, happily assisted by clubs who know their own place in the Premier League pecking order.

A place where they are grateful to lease footballers not good enough for Chelsea’s first team, happy to either be a finishing school for Chelsea kids or put them in a shop window on a rich club’s behalf.

Swansea, Crystal Palace, Huddersfield and Stoke – and don’t rule out one or two more before the season starts – trumpet these signings as though they have pulled off a coup.

You have not. These are not your players. You have been chosen because you are not any threat, and might be useful.


Assuming these borrowing clubs believe the Blues loanees will make their teams stronger, the Premier League fixture list will be distorted to Chelsea’s benefit.

On at least EIGHT occasions next season, Chelsea will play against a team that the Premier League ‘parent club’ rules will make officially weakened.


They will play against teams that cannot field the line-up it would send out against Chelsea’s title rivals.

The Blues won’t be alone in loaning within the Premier League – with Joe Hart loaned to West Ham, Manchester City can now count on two matches against a club forced to play their second-choice keeper.

But no other club will have a vested interest in, and influence on, as many other sides as Chelsea.

It won’t change. It suits all clubs in the Premier League.

That doesn’t make it right.[/article]

Loans to PL clubs
Kasey Palmer - Huddersfield
Tammy Abraham - Swansea
Ruben Loftus-Cheek - Crystal Palace
Kurt Zouma - Stoke
Izzy Brown - Brighton

Loans to Championship clubs
Ola Aina - Hull
Ike Ugbo - Barnsley
Lucas Piazon - Fulham
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom