Rather a silly, unnecessary reply. Unfortunately it gives the impression that you're an attention seeking, know-it-all prick which I'm sure you're not.
Its official.. were skint.. Loan signings in January.. if we are lucky..
- Thread starter 6TimesaRed
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
stuff your money up your sh1tter. Id rather see us do things our own way with scousers,youth, brits and players that WANT to play here ...than spend 300 million on a foriegn mercanary harlem globetrotter galactico falsehood. sh1te like drossena,babel,jovanovic,poulsen and other cripple impersonations.
If we dont win for a while because city and chelsea have temporarily distorted the market so be it. at least lets go about things in a way we can hold our heads high.
If we dont win for a while because city and chelsea have temporarily distorted the market so be it. at least lets go about things in a way we can hold our heads high.
His problem with Wenger is he's not a guaranteed starter. If we offered him a starting position every game on the right wing and a nice wage, he's happily join.
Yes, foreign mercenary harlem globetrotter galacticos like Suarez.
The trouble with that is: how temporary is "temporarily"? I don't see things changing any time soon, if they ever do, and I'm not prepared to accept that we should resign ourselves to being permanent also-rans.
well lets see if he sticks about and becomes a molby type honorary scouser or a torres eh?
wanna guess where my money is?
Rael's back.
Stunning deflection
So apparently we're after ince and sturridge as our two main targets. Forgetting about whether or not ince is good enough, how could we possibly be contemplating spending a few million on a player we let go for nothing last year because he wouldn't sign a new contract. Does this alone prove that its only paper talk and a load of bullshit? I think its barrett that's saying it though so Im not so sure.
In fairness to Rodgers, he wasn't party to the decision to let Ince go.
The Sturridge thing is starting to gather pace.
regards
regards
I don't really get why we're letting Coates go ... It seems like a mistake on our part on two levels - one, we take away one of Suarez's mates and two, we're giving up a highly rated defender who could be starting for us in 1-2 years.
I heard a rumour that he had family problems.
I find it maddening that he hasn't played much at all this season, i hope he doesn't go, I thought he'd be a defender for us for the future.
He wants to leave?
How many lizard dollars do we have to spend?
Apparently specifying exactly how much much he wants to be paid and where he is prepared to play.
Want might not be the right word. But it might be hard for him to stay.
Sturr crazy? Chelsea reserve wants £80k a week AND position pledge from Liverpool
3 Dec 2012 22:31
Reds have made an approach about a January deal but striker wants mega money and a guarantee he'll play only through the middle not out wide
Wide of the mark? Sturridge's verdict of his value far exceeds Liverpool's
The Reds have already asked Chelsea about their reserve striker’s availability, and look set to follow up their interest, which dates back to the summer, in the winter transfer window.
There is a feeling at Anfield, however, that Sturridge has done little in the last 12 months to justify such big wages since his fine start to last season.
Back then, he scored 10 goals playing wide in an attacking three under Andre Villas-Boas.
But since last December, he has scored just five times for the European Champions.
The 23-year-old’s camp also insist he MUST play through the middle if he were to move to Liverpool next month.
Liverpool are keen not to repeat the financial mistakes of past windows after big signings Andy Carroll, Jordan Henderson and Stewart Downing struggled to make any sort of impact.
Liverpool negotiating with Chelsea over Daniel Sturridge transfer, although £80,000-a-week 'demands' are dismissed
Chelsea striker frustrated by lack of starts
Chelsea striker Daniel Sturridge wants to make a January exit from Stamford Bridge - with Liverpool his first-choice destination.
3 Dec 2012 22:31
Reds have made an approach about a January deal but striker wants mega money and a guarantee he'll play only through the middle not out wide
Michael Steele
Daniel Sturridge is demanding a staggering £80,000 a week to move to Liverpool in January.The Reds have already asked Chelsea about their reserve striker’s availability, and look set to follow up their interest, which dates back to the summer, in the winter transfer window.
There is a feeling at Anfield, however, that Sturridge has done little in the last 12 months to justify such big wages since his fine start to last season.
Back then, he scored 10 goals playing wide in an attacking three under Andre Villas-Boas.
But since last December, he has scored just five times for the European Champions.
The 23-year-old’s camp also insist he MUST play through the middle if he were to move to Liverpool next month.
Liverpool are keen not to repeat the financial mistakes of past windows after big signings Andy Carroll, Jordan Henderson and Stewart Downing struggled to make any sort of impact.
Liverpool negotiating with Chelsea over Daniel Sturridge transfer, although £80,000-a-week 'demands' are dismissed
Chelsea striker frustrated by lack of starts
TUESDAY 04 DECEMBER 2012
in
A number of clubs are understood to be interested in the striker but Liverpool and Chelsea have begun talks over a £15m deal and Sturridge has set his sights on a move to Anfield reports the Evening Standard.
The 23-year-old, who joined from Manchester City for £6.5m in 2009, has become increasingly frustrated over his lack of starts up front and hopes a deal with the Reds will be agreed.
There have been reports that Sturridge has demanded £80,000-a-week to join the Reds, as well as guarantees over a starting role, however the striker's representatives have denied this.
"Daniel Sturridge does not conduct his business in public," they said.
"He also does not make demands in any negotiation, with regards to salary or his playing position.
"Any contract between a club and a player has to be based on mutual agreement."
Although Liverpool failed with a loan offer in the summer, manager Brendan Rodgers has been told funds will be available to sign Sturridge permanently in the new year.
The former City trainee has scored 24 goals in 95 appearances for the Blues — five more than rival Fernando Torres from 90 games — but has been mostly played out wide on the right flank.
His form has been good enough to earn four England caps and he also played up front for the Great Britain Olympic team in the summer.
Sturridge has started just two games for Chelsea this season due to a persistent hamstring injury but has conceded he will never be given a chance to be first-choice striker. Torres has been consistently picked ahead of him since joining for a British record £50m from Liverpool last year, even though he has failed to impress.
Chelsea are growing impatient over Torres but are expected to try to sign another big-name forward such as Atletico Madrid’s Radamel Falcao or Napoli’s Edinson Cavani rather than give Sturridge a run in the side.
He's a good player, but feck this for a game of soldiers. Do Not Want.
Seems we're being linked with Ba today. I'd far sooner sign him if his medical stands up.
- Status
