Poll I'll swap yeeeee...
- Thread starter Oncy
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Prefix for Poll Threads
- Status
We should not have a Manager who goes to Birmingham and plays (or expects) for a draw, and Roy did it, and Rafa did it too.
No wonder the players looked shite, it was the game plan.
Stick Keegen, up there he's shite but plays to win, how I'd LOVE to see us play to win for once!
No wonder the players looked shite, it was the game plan.
Stick Keegen, up there he's shite but plays to win, how I'd LOVE to see us play to win for once!
[quote author=Sven link=topic=41865.msg1173824#msg1173824 date=1284390466]
Hodgson is a fucking cunt and should be sacked before it's too late.
[/quote]Yeah thats noooooot reeeeeeally what i asked Sven. Plus its Roy is a *insert saggy faced or age based slur here* fucking cunt as any fule kno!
Hodgson is a fucking cunt and should be sacked before it's too late.
[/quote]Yeah thats noooooot reeeeeeally what i asked Sven. Plus its Roy is a *insert saggy faced or age based slur here* fucking cunt as any fule kno!
i'd swap back.
i'd trust rafa to get us fourth more than i trust the hodge. the hodge is everything i expected him to be, and i didn't want him.
It's not looking good, but with returning players it could turn better.
Regardless, few people here were overjoyed with this signing, but let's at least be respectful...
Calling him all sorts of names, and always referencing his age is getting a bit much.
he's either good enough or he's not. But let's not start calling him c&*t and other names..
Regardless, few people here were overjoyed with this signing, but let's at least be respectful...
Calling him all sorts of names, and always referencing his age is getting a bit much.
he's either good enough or he's not. But let's not start calling him c&*t and other names..
[quote author=localny link=topic=41865.msg1173839#msg1173839 date=1284392796]
It's not looking good, but with returning players it could turn better.
Regardless, few people here were overjoyed with this signing, but let's at least be respectful...
Calling him all sorts of names, and always referencing his age is getting a bit much.
he's either good enough or he's not. But let's not start calling him c&*t and other names..
[/quote]
His Legacy might be 'He made Souness look like a good Liverpool Manager' though
It's not looking good, but with returning players it could turn better.
Regardless, few people here were overjoyed with this signing, but let's at least be respectful...
Calling him all sorts of names, and always referencing his age is getting a bit much.
he's either good enough or he's not. But let's not start calling him c&*t and other names..
[/quote]
His Legacy might be 'He made Souness look like a good Liverpool Manager' though
Nobody with any clue whatsoever wanted Hodgeson.
S
Squiggles
Guest
Benitez had totally lost it and had to leave.
Hodgson had done a fine job for two years on a tight budget. He was a logical choice for the job and needs more time before people start jumping on his back.
We won't persist with the clones in the middle, and we've had a tough start to the season. Things are going to get better. I'm still optimistic and have faith in the boss.
Hodgson had done a fine job for two years on a tight budget. He was a logical choice for the job and needs more time before people start jumping on his back.
We won't persist with the clones in the middle, and we've had a tough start to the season. Things are going to get better. I'm still optimistic and have faith in the boss.
I wouldnt swap back.
Not because i think Rafa was a worse manager, and I think Rafa was miles better.
But he lost the plot, and most of us know how the story would end if he were still here.
Hodgson might ultimately fail as badly as Rafa did, but there's still a chance.
So I'm not twisting.
Not because i think Rafa was a worse manager, and I think Rafa was miles better.
But he lost the plot, and most of us know how the story would end if he were still here.
Hodgson might ultimately fail as badly as Rafa did, but there's still a chance.
So I'm not twisting.
Rafa's overall record proves he's a better manager than Roy. It also proves he wouldn't have been a better manager for LFC, not any more.
No swap.
No swap.
[quote author=localny link=topic=41865.msg1173860#msg1173860 date=1284394673]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=41865.msg1173843#msg1173843 date=1284393424]
Nobody with any clue whatsoever wanted Hodgeson.
[/quote]
Apparently someone started a Hodgson out thread, and got excoriated!
[/quote]
I stuck up for you. I thought it did exactly what you wanted it to: express your dismay and also generate debate.
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=41865.msg1173843#msg1173843 date=1284393424]
Nobody with any clue whatsoever wanted Hodgeson.
[/quote]
Apparently someone started a Hodgson out thread, and got excoriated!
[/quote]
I stuck up for you. I thought it did exactly what you wanted it to: express your dismay and also generate debate.
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=41865.msg1173862#msg1173862 date=1284394733]
[quote author=localny link=topic=41865.msg1173860#msg1173860 date=1284394673]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=41865.msg1173843#msg1173843 date=1284393424]
Nobody with any clue whatsoever wanted Hodgeson.
[/quote]
Apparently someone started a Hodgson out thread, and got excoriated!
[/quote]
I stuck up for you. I thought it did exactly what you wanted it to: express your dismay and also generate debate.
[/quote]
Nice one - thanks for that - just wanted to express surprise that people were thinking "look at the mess we're in, this is as good as we can get". Having said that, i want to see what he can do with a full strength team - Cole, Torres, Gerrard, and Meirles in the same starting 11.
[quote author=localny link=topic=41865.msg1173860#msg1173860 date=1284394673]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=41865.msg1173843#msg1173843 date=1284393424]
Nobody with any clue whatsoever wanted Hodgeson.
[/quote]
Apparently someone started a Hodgson out thread, and got excoriated!
[/quote]
I stuck up for you. I thought it did exactly what you wanted it to: express your dismay and also generate debate.
[/quote]
Nice one - thanks for that - just wanted to express surprise that people were thinking "look at the mess we're in, this is as good as we can get". Having said that, i want to see what he can do with a full strength team - Cole, Torres, Gerrard, and Meirles in the same starting 11.
I wanted Pellegrini or Van Gaal.
Still do.
Still do.
I'll use cars as an analogy. Rafa was a flawed genius, capable of perfection along with momemts of moments of immense frustration. Think vintage Ferrari that will not start (most of last season), but in the moments when it is going well, no-one is better (Madrid, Barca, 4-1 Scum).
The Royster is a steady pair of hand, a Golf Diesel, perhaps.
Which would you prefer?
The Royster is a steady pair of hand, a Golf Diesel, perhaps.
Which would you prefer?
The simple answer would be "whichever is more likely to get you (at least towards) where you want to go".
And when the (very) vintage Ferrari spends much of the journey going backwards, thus rendering you farther from your intended destination than you were when you began that trip (and getting even further away with each passing mile), I'd HAVE to try the Golf Diesel, as, though it may not be as sexy a motor, when the other car has proven that it's simply not going to get you there, it's the better option, because it MAY get you there.
It may not have been when you first bought the Ferrari, of course. But that's a long time ago now.
And when the (very) vintage Ferrari spends much of the journey going backwards, thus rendering you farther from your intended destination than you were when you began that trip (and getting even further away with each passing mile), I'd HAVE to try the Golf Diesel, as, though it may not be as sexy a motor, when the other car has proven that it's simply not going to get you there, it's the better option, because it MAY get you there.
It may not have been when you first bought the Ferrari, of course. But that's a long time ago now.
I'd have rafa back, his 65th minute subs are now starting to look like swift action from the dugout.
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=41865.msg1173939#msg1173939 date=1284406178]
The simple answer would be "whichever is more likely to get you (at least towards) where you want to go".
And when the (very) vintage Ferrari spends much of the journey going backwards, thus rendering you farther from your intended destination than you were when you began that trip (and getting even further away with each passing mile), I'd HAVE to try the Golf Diesel, as, though it may not be as sexy a motor, when the other car has proven that it's simply not going to get you there, it's the better option, because it MAY get you there.
It may not have been when you first bought the Ferrari, of course. But that's a long time ago now.
[/quote]
Sorry, but I'll never be satisfied with a Golf diesel.
The simple answer would be "whichever is more likely to get you (at least towards) where you want to go".
And when the (very) vintage Ferrari spends much of the journey going backwards, thus rendering you farther from your intended destination than you were when you began that trip (and getting even further away with each passing mile), I'd HAVE to try the Golf Diesel, as, though it may not be as sexy a motor, when the other car has proven that it's simply not going to get you there, it's the better option, because it MAY get you there.
It may not have been when you first bought the Ferrari, of course. But that's a long time ago now.
[/quote]
Sorry, but I'll never be satisfied with a Golf diesel.
[quote author=vantage link=topic=41865.msg1173967#msg1173967 date=1284407894]
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=41865.msg1173939#msg1173939 date=1284406178]
The simple answer would be "whichever is more likely to get you (at least towards) where you want to go".
And when the (very) vintage Ferrari spends much of the journey going backwards, thus rendering you farther from your intended destination than you were when you began that trip (and getting even further away with each passing mile), I'd HAVE to try the Golf Diesel, as, though it may not be as sexy a motor, when the other car has proven that it's simply not going to get you there, it's the better option, because it MAY get you there.
It may not have been when you first bought the Ferrari, of course. But that's a long time ago now.
[/quote]
Sorry, but I'll never be satisfied with a Golf diesel.
[/quote]
A volvo always got me into europe with no problems.
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=41865.msg1173939#msg1173939 date=1284406178]
The simple answer would be "whichever is more likely to get you (at least towards) where you want to go".
And when the (very) vintage Ferrari spends much of the journey going backwards, thus rendering you farther from your intended destination than you were when you began that trip (and getting even further away with each passing mile), I'd HAVE to try the Golf Diesel, as, though it may not be as sexy a motor, when the other car has proven that it's simply not going to get you there, it's the better option, because it MAY get you there.
It may not have been when you first bought the Ferrari, of course. But that's a long time ago now.
[/quote]
Sorry, but I'll never be satisfied with a Golf diesel.
[/quote]
A volvo always got me into europe with no problems.
- Status
