Poll I hate Polls, but.....

[mark1975]

Who would you rather see leave, if we had to sell one of the two this Summer, as they seem the two most likely candidates...

 

[themn]

Easy.

 

[Rosco]

Mark is racist too.

that explains it

 

[FoxForceFive]

Well Rodgers just said 'he's (Agger) is very important to what I want to do here).

 

[Judge Jules]

Pissed, was he? 😉

 

[themn]

Jon Fox's grammar in DANGER yo !

 

[FoxForceFive]

You'll note the time.

My 4 year old goes to bed at 8.

Mutli tasking is not one of my strong points.

 

[themn]

Don't do it then.

 

[dmishra]

You'll note the time.

My 4 year old goes to bed at 8.

Mutli tasking is not one of my strong points.

Clearly 😉

 

[themn]

LOL.

 

[SaintGeorge67]

I voted for Carroll when I meant Agger.

Agger is excellent but I think Carroll COULD be more important for us if he can get his shit together consistently.

 

[Mersey86]

I would prefer Agger. We'll get a fair price for Agger (plus a bit extra, considering his injury history). Carroll - I think there's a lot more to come.

 

[themn]

I would prefer Agger. We'll get a fair price for Agger (plus a bit extra, considering his injury history). Carroll - I think there's a lot more to come.

Plus, you can't be arsed to change your avatar.

 

[Stulikesdrums]

I voted for AC as Agger is far more important to this club IMO

 

[peterhague]

I voted for Carroll because I've never rated him and been a strong critic of his transfer right from the start. However, whenever I remind people of that it hardly ever occurs to them to congratulate me.

 

[dogboy]

Agger for me. 20 mill for an injury prone 27 year old centre half, (no matter how much I enjoy see him play), no brainer.

 

[nealmac]

Carroll. I think we need Agger a lot more.

 

[keniget]

I voted for Carroll.

You could probably spend all day arguing the pros and cons of keeping one over the other and what would benefit the club most however ultimately I like Agger. Carroll no so much. Not so difficult after all.

 

[Ryan]

Is this a joke?

One's a good footballer that we should keep, the other's Andy Carroll.

 

[Gerry_A_Trick]

I suppose it depends on how much we'd get for them and who we could get instead.

But it's still Carroll, even though I don't mind if he stays.

 

[jon545660]

Would like to keep both, but if its one or the other then I'd rather lose Carroll. It's looking like he'd only be a bit part player under BR anyway.

 

[red_maradona]

agger is one of the best defenders in europe, carroll is in unproven epl striker.

 

[Frogfish]

I voted for Carroll when I meant Agger.

Agger is excellent but I think Carroll COULD be more important for us if he can get his shit together consistently.

Whatever you do don't sit on the fence George 😉

 

[juniormember]

Agger's being looked at by top clubs.
Andy's being looked at by Newcastle and West fecking Ham.

 

[StevieM]

Sell them both and use the 45m wisely.

 

[juniormember]

We'll be priced out of players and completely screwed for the new season with only a couple of weeks to go.
No way should we sell them both.

 

[Squiggles]

Andy Carroll

Easy.

 

[RedStar]

This is no contest, Carroll is a complete waste of time, he has already buried one manager, Rodgers at least seems to be canny enough to want rid of him as soon as humanly possible.
No club even wants to sign him on a permanent basis. Agger is being courted by some of the biggest clubs in the game. I really cannot see why anybody who has seen both players play would even consider selling Agger and keeping Carroll