FA to warn Liverpool and Dalglish about their future conduct
- Thread starter King Binny
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
What the fuck??? The FA can really go to hell. What makes them think they are above criticism? They screw up an investigation and made a predetermined verdict.....they are rightly being criticised. Why can't the club explore any other avenue of justice where the FA is not involved in deciding the verdict....because this has gone on long enough.
What makes them think they can dictate how a club can field a player in a game or not? It's multi million dollar business, and Suarez alone cost 25 million in transfer fees and even more in wages. What the fuck makes them think they can dictate how and when he plays? They are driving a quality player out of the club because they wanted make a statement? They can go fuck themselves.....how is anyone supposed to run a business, if the field of play is unfair?
What makes them think they can dictate how a club can field a player in a game or not? It's multi million dollar business, and Suarez alone cost 25 million in transfer fees and even more in wages. What the fuck makes them think they can dictate how and when he plays? They are driving a quality player out of the club because they wanted make a statement? They can go fuck themselves.....how is anyone supposed to run a business, if the field of play is unfair?
[quote author=Hansern link=topic=48194.msg1459474#msg1459474 date=1326006615]
Read the other day that of the last 473 cases , two were found not guilty. And 0 was overturned on appeal, 0....
The FA are a joke.
[/quote]
Well, wait for the EBJT case - you might be in for a surprise...
Read the other day that of the last 473 cases , two were found not guilty. And 0 was overturned on appeal, 0....
The FA are a joke.
[/quote]
Well, wait for the EBJT case - you might be in for a surprise...
[quote author=jimmy link=topic=48194.msg1459477#msg1459477 date=1326007090]
[quote author=Hansern link=topic=48194.msg1459474#msg1459474 date=1326006615]
Read the other day that of the last 473 cases , two were found not guilty. And 0 was overturned on appeal, 0....
The FA are a joke.
[/quote]
Well, wait for the EBJT case - you might be in for a surprise...
[/quote]
Dont get your hopes up!!!
[quote author=Hansern link=topic=48194.msg1459474#msg1459474 date=1326006615]
Read the other day that of the last 473 cases , two were found not guilty. And 0 was overturned on appeal, 0....
The FA are a joke.
[/quote]
Well, wait for the EBJT case - you might be in for a surprise...
[/quote]
Dont get your hopes up!!!
R
RedZeppelin
Guest
[quote author=Hansern link=topic=48194.msg1459474#msg1459474 date=1326006615]
Read the other day that of the last 473 cases , two were found not guilty. And 0 was overturned on appeal, 0....
The FA are a joke.
[/quote]
i read that the other day and they seemed to be offering it as proof of how good their disciplinary system is ...but they make the decision so can just find everyone guilty if they want !! ridiculous
Read the other day that of the last 473 cases , two were found not guilty. And 0 was overturned on appeal, 0....
The FA are a joke.
[/quote]
i read that the other day and they seemed to be offering it as proof of how good their disciplinary system is ...but they make the decision so can just find everyone guilty if they want !! ridiculous
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=48194.msg1459482#msg1459482 date=1326011248]
The FA has a 99.5% conviction rate which means, as soon as you're charged you're guilty. To me its an indication that process is bent as fuck
[/quote]
Yep. Mainly because they are the police, judge and jury.
The FA has a 99.5% conviction rate which means, as soon as you're charged you're guilty. To me its an indication that process is bent as fuck
[/quote]
Yep. Mainly because they are the police, judge and jury.
It's at times like this that you find out who your friends are.
Our friends don't seem to include any of the many former Liverpool players who have profited from their association with the club to obtain comfortable, very well-paid jobs in the media. The most supportive comments I have heard from any of them is that the club has handled the episode badly. The implication is that the club should have accepted the injustice of the FA's disciplinary procedure, issued an apology that they didn't believe in, and punished Suarez in some way.
I think it would have been very dishonourable and insincere of the club to have behaved like that. The right reaction of injustice is to fight it - to cry out against it.
The one former Liverpool player who did not seem desperate to avoid saying anything controversial was John Barnes, who was briefly interviewed on Saturday by ITV as part of their FA Cup coverage. Barnes didn't resort to "the club has handled it badly" and said he thought the club had reasons to dispute the FA committee's fairness.
Our friends don't seem to include any of the many former Liverpool players who have profited from their association with the club to obtain comfortable, very well-paid jobs in the media. The most supportive comments I have heard from any of them is that the club has handled the episode badly. The implication is that the club should have accepted the injustice of the FA's disciplinary procedure, issued an apology that they didn't believe in, and punished Suarez in some way.
I think it would have been very dishonourable and insincere of the club to have behaved like that. The right reaction of injustice is to fight it - to cry out against it.
The one former Liverpool player who did not seem desperate to avoid saying anything controversial was John Barnes, who was briefly interviewed on Saturday by ITV as part of their FA Cup coverage. Barnes didn't resort to "the club has handled it badly" and said he thought the club had reasons to dispute the FA committee's fairness.
Well, the Rooney case at least got a reduced ban, so they can find loopholes if they want :'(
Hahahahh dalglish should reply to their letter with this
The FA can go fuck themselves.
I hope when asked about this Kenny simply smiles & says something along the lines of, 'Well the FA aren't running Liverpool Football Club, when they are maybe I'll start to worry about what they think'
I hope when asked about this Kenny simply smiles & says something along the lines of, 'Well the FA aren't running Liverpool Football Club, when they are maybe I'll start to worry about what they think'
the fa expect liverpool bend over even though liverpool feel unfairly treated? are they for real?
The FA reminds me of that TV producer in Annie Hall when he's showing off his range of canned laughter options: 'Press this one for belly laughs, press this for medium-sized chuckles...' Alvy Singer says 'Do you have booing on that?' It's laughable those idiots still try to claim the moral high ground over Blatter because they're just as corrupt as he is.
imho the fa want to be percieved as being proactive in their fight against racism and so made an example of suarez and still want to be percieved as proactive so will not let this drop so all parties can move on.
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48194.msg1459564#msg1459564 date=1326026340]
imho the fa want to be percieved as being proactive in their fight against racism .
[/quote]
They want to be seen as pro-active in their fight against Blatter. All the hacks know this, but most of them are England mad Blatter haters, too. Racism has, alas, rarely bothered them in the past.
imho the fa want to be percieved as being proactive in their fight against racism .
[/quote]
They want to be seen as pro-active in their fight against Blatter. All the hacks know this, but most of them are England mad Blatter haters, too. Racism has, alas, rarely bothered them in the past.
[quote author=gkmacca link=topic=48194.msg1459566#msg1459566 date=1326026448]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48194.msg1459564#msg1459564 date=1326026340]
imho the fa want to be percieved as being proactive in their fight against racism .
[/quote]
They want to be seen as pro-active in their fight against Blatter. All the hacks know this, but most of them are England mad Blatter haters, too. Racism has, alas, rarely bothered them in the past.
[/quote]
if rooting out racism what the cause of the red rag to the bull then that is to be admired but I doubt that it is. 8 games? come on, cantona got only a few more games for kung-fu kicking a fan live on tv.
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48194.msg1459564#msg1459564 date=1326026340]
imho the fa want to be percieved as being proactive in their fight against racism .
[/quote]
They want to be seen as pro-active in their fight against Blatter. All the hacks know this, but most of them are England mad Blatter haters, too. Racism has, alas, rarely bothered them in the past.
[/quote]
if rooting out racism what the cause of the red rag to the bull then that is to be admired but I doubt that it is. 8 games? come on, cantona got only a few more games for kung-fu kicking a fan live on tv.
I was listening to "Sportsweek" on BBC Radio 5 Live this morning, hosted by that prat Garry Richardson. He's the idiot who rushes up to tennis players at Wimbledon and asks them silly questions at inappropriate times.
There was a long interview with Piara Powar of "Football Against Racism in Europe - FARE." Predictably very hostile to Liverpool with everybody in the studio joining in the condemnation.
Powar's recommendation was that the FA should charge both Kenny Dalglish and Liverpool Football Club with "bringing the game into disrepute."
The type of offence which doesn't exist in proper law but would be very understandable to prosecutors in the former Soviet show trials.
There was a long interview with Piara Powar of "Football Against Racism in Europe - FARE." Predictably very hostile to Liverpool with everybody in the studio joining in the condemnation.
Powar's recommendation was that the FA should charge both Kenny Dalglish and Liverpool Football Club with "bringing the game into disrepute."
The type of offence which doesn't exist in proper law but would be very understandable to prosecutors in the former Soviet show trials.
Another sports lawyer, who preferred not be named, described the FA as "police, judge and jury all rolled into one".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/16430580.stm
One can understand why he preferred not to be named. 😛
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/16430580.stm
One can understand why he preferred not to be named. 😛
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=48194.msg1459482#msg1459482 date=1326011248]
The FA has a 99.5% conviction rate
[/quote]
Followed in second place by Col Gaddaffi on 96% and Robert Mugabe in third on 94%
The FA has a 99.5% conviction rate
[/quote]
Followed in second place by Col Gaddaffi on 96% and Robert Mugabe in third on 94%
Boys pen. Now there's some memories. Just reminds how (relatively) soulless Anfield is now compared to then. Inevitable, but sad.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked