• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Debt and Ownership Model

Status
Not open for further replies.

peekay

Very Well-Known
Member
There seems to be a lot of fanfare about Barca model being the best and the most ideal one. However, I am wondering about how debt management decisions are made in such a set up. According to this article, barcelona are in debt to the order of £420million over what needs to be paid for Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Dmytro Chygrynskiy and now David Villa. Why is it not a big issue for them as it is for us. And why arent UEFA and Platini making a big fuss over the Barca model.

Another doubt I have is that every year we hear Barca president candidates making promises to buy stars. Now when the President gets elected, does he buy the stars out of his own money or does he buy the stars and just piles em on with the debt? I am assuming the latter and in that scenario, I am not sure if fan ownership is the way to go?

"Barcelona’s ‘stratospheric’ debt could wreck their hopes of landing Cesc Fabregas this summer.
Presidential candidate Sandro Rosell, has warned the Catalan club that they must balance the books if they want to continue their £40million pursuit of the Arsenal captain.

“We must be careful, because from an economic standpoint we are not good,†said Rosell. “We have a stratospheric level of debt. £420million over what needs to be paid for Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Dmytro Chygrynskiy."

“We must improve the squad each year, but we must also make sure that we are managing the economic resources that the club needs to survive.†The Swedish striker, and defender Chygrynskiy cost Barca close to £70million last summer, and both have failed to make a sufficient impact at the Nou Camp, meaning that they could be shipped out for a as little as half of what the club paid for them.

Rosell also went on to express his doubts over the £35million fee that the Spanish champions paid for David Villa. “From a sporting point of view it is a very good signing, but from an economic one we maybe needed a little more information. “Maybe there were other options available, for the cost and salary, so we lacked the right information to know whether the €50million price was a fair one. “If we add Cesc as well for €50, that increases our debt by another €100million,†bemoaned Rosell.

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/EuroSpy-transfer-news-Barcelona-s-stratospheric-debt-could-wreck-bid-for-Arsenal-captain-Cesc-Fabregas-article432055.html
 
Barca have the second-highest wage bill in world football, next to that other 'financially-doped' Spanish club

I'd love to see them go tits up, but it will never happen to either club because one represent Franco's Spain, the and the capital, and the other represents everyone else

They will be propped up regardless of what happens to their accounts

Unless the entire country goes the way of Greece
 
They have the advantage of being able to negotiate their own TV deals also, so they get ridiculous amounts compared to the other Spanish clubs. Ebbsfleet United are famously fan owned too, and while i haven't checked recently I don't think they're doing too well.

I suppose what I'm saying is the ownership model isn't going to determine whether a club is successful or not. That said it's no surprise that the German's have the best run league in Europe. Their model of governance is well worth looking at.
 
Their model of governance is well worth looking at.

*Eyeballs Rosco suspiciously*

homes.jpg
 
Ebbsfleet are fan owned and are doing awfully. Just relegated from the conference and skint. The difference is though that the fans who own Ebbsfleet are not their own fans. They signed up to buy a club. They didn't know it would be Ebbsfleet. I suspect they were a bit disappointed!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom