Okay, the madness meter has just gone up to eleven. I'm oot.
Everybody remembers that line from Robocop
Okay, the madness meter has just gone up to eleven. I'm oot.
If he's so good why didnt he get us there five times?
We outspent about all but five clubs in Europe during his reign.
So we spent the 6th most, which means we should only have got to the quarters on average?
His record of winners, last 16, finalists, quarters, quarters suggests he's done better than he should have.
You should really stick to just going on about his league performances, there's way more reason to attack that. There's no justification for attacking his ability in getting results in European Competition. He was consistently(ok, not totally consistent, but close enough) great at getting results.
I think we had more luck than that
Didn't we get knocked out in a semi final?
I can't believe some posters are decrying Rafa's legacy because we got "lucky" against AC Milan! Even if it was true that Finnan's injury forced Rafa's hand and led us to a winning formula on the night it completely overlooks the fact that under Rafa we beat Inter Milan Home & Away, won in Barcelona, thumped Real madrid and Man Utd 4-1 in the same week, beat Chelsea in 2 CL semi-finals and a host of other great CL performances. The fact that he couldn't quite replicate the success in the league and that his last season was awful should never take away from the fact that Rafa made us one of Europe's top teams during his tenure.
I still hope he fails miserably at Chelsea.
Semis in 2008
Did we? We could have done, either way, his record in Europe can't really be knocked.
Our improvement was down to doubling the wage bill and big transfer spending. At a time when not many other European clubs could match us.
Nobody should be judged on cup records because of the nature of the competition. Small sample size, the amount of times matches are decided by bad refereeing, luck etc
Is it not fair to say that there was a healthy mix of brilliance AND luck in our 2005? As there is in EVERY victorious campaign..?
Nobody should be judged on cup records because of the nature of the competition. Small sample size, the amount of times matches are decided by bad refereeing, luck etc
We DID get lucky in the final... Traore's goalline clearance, Shev's double sitter, etc... Of course we did. You don't get back into a game you're losing 0-3 to AC Milan without a large slice of luck. That said, our getting there, though also tinged with some lucky breaks - Ibra's miss in Turin, Gudjonsen's howler, etc - was down to some outstanding tactical performances and strategies... Juventus in both legs particularly stands out. And though it wasn't pretty, the Chelsea semi-final went EXACTLY as Rafa planned it.
We were lucky to win it, yes. But we also deserved it, once we won it. You don't get past Juve, Chelsea and Milan on luck alone.
So you agree with everyone besides Ross? Good.
Is it not fair to say that there was a healthy mix of brilliance AND luck in our 2005? As there is in EVERY victorious campaign..?
To deny what Rafa achieved is just a sign of ignorance. yeah im glad he's gone and think he had to go but he did some great things while he was here. As well as all thats been said he also made us the Number 1 team in europe. That's no small achievement at all. He is a very good manager, but seems better suited to cup competitions than the league.
So, people who disagree with you about this topic are cretins, John?
Serious question: If Ross wasn't quite as "Ross" about this particular topic, would you agree with ANY part of what he's saying..?
I think everyone agrees with some parts of what he's saying.