• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Carroll

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ossi

Active
Member
Carroll's out for 6-8 weeks. He has just scored one goal, hasn't he?

What is the deal? WH must buy him if they stay in the EPL?
 
Now that the "injury-prone" is added to his resume, I'm afraid Carroll's value will plummet even lower. Letting him to go on loan backfires in a spectacular fashion.
 
He made it clear he did want him, which has surely reduced our bargaining position when we do decide to sell him.
We never had a bargaining position though, anyone who watched any football last season knew he wasn't wanted and would never be worth what we paid.
 
We never had a bargaining position though, anyone who watched any football last season knew he wasn't wanted and would never be worth what we paid.

Eh?

Last season we had a manger who signed him and then defended him at every opportunity.

New manager comes, say he Caroll has to prove himself.

Then BR says he would be a "nutcase" to let the player go out on loan.

Then sends him out on loan.
 
Don't worry lads, don't forget that bit of toilet roll that they wrote in crayon on saying 'we promise to buy andy carroll for millions and millions if we stay up'. That'll be our saviour.
I'm still convinced he could good for us if he got his hair cut.
 
Eh?

Last season we had a manger who signed him and then defended him at every opportunity.

New manager comes, say he Caroll has to prove himself.

Then BR says he would be a "nutcase" to let the player go out on loan.

Then sends him out on loan.
He was barely played though, was he?

Scores, then dropped and didn't play consistently well even under the guy who bought him.
 
There was a deal in place to make his move permi but AC wouldn't agree to go out on loan with an option of an automatic transfer.

The people who bought him are totally responsible for this predicament not BR.
 
There was a deal in place to make his move permi but AC wouldn't agree to go out on loan with an option of an automatic transfer.

The people who bought him are totally responsible for this predicament not BR.
^^^ This guy gets it
 
We sold a striker that couldn't score for £50M and replaced him with another that couldn't score for £35M on lower wages.

Whilst not a roaring success the scenario does end up with us being at least £15M to the good.
 
We sold a striker that couldn't score for £50M and replaced him with another that couldn't score for £35M on lower wages.

Whilst not a roaring success the scenario does end up with us being at least £15M to the good.

Torres could score before we sold him, and Carroll could score before we bought him!

Bizarre couple of transfers. Both players pretty much ruined
 
Christ what a disaster that signing has been, it ruined multiple careers in one go

I think Carroll will end up playing a lower division, he clearly doesn't have the pace movement or dedication to make it in the top flight. The fact is he had a great spell for 5 months and we misjudged him terribly. There is usually a striker or two each season that come from nowhere to have a good 6/7 months but nobody is daft enough to make them a record breaking transfer, except us.

We will struggle to find a club willing to take him on permanently and probably end up taking a huge loss on him and paying a percentage of his wages just to get him out the fucking door
 
Not sure why Rodgers was so keen to get rid of him. Given the fact that we have so few strikers it seems a little strange. I guess he had his reasons though.

I'd quite like to see him get another chance really, but I doubt it will happen. He'll either be sold to someone on the cheap at the end of the season or go out on loan again.
 
Not sure why Rodgers was so keen to get rid of him. Given the fact that we have so few strikers it seems a little strange. I guess he had his reasons though.

He's a distraction. Everyone concentrates on the 'Carroll situation' due to his price tag (and shitness) and the whole thing invites pressure. Rodgers was right to get rid of him. His / the boards failing was not bringing in a replacement.

Either way, that 17M is starting to sound pretty damn good right about now. I doubt we'll get it though.
 
It all has a terrible sense of inevitability about it that prick Pardew will get his way and have him for £10m-£12m pounds, and he will become a top player again
 
I don't think we'll get 12 million for now that he's been in and out of the hospital for 2 seasons in a row. And has a high salary. In hindsight, that insulting lowball offer from Newcastle was the best deal we had any hope of getting. I hope I am wrong.
 
It'll be another Aquilani. He might hang around for another season on loan somewhere, before finally moving on for £7-8m.

Utter fucking disaster.
 
It all has a terrible sense of inevitability about it that prick Pardew will get his way and have him for £10m-£12m pounds, and he will become a top player again

He was never a top player, he was a flash in the pan. Unless you count Amir Zaki and Michael Ricketts as top players
 
article-2242648-16577D4F000005DC-83_634x433.jpg


article-2242648-16577CFE000005DC-735_634x504.jpg



on the piss in dublin for West ham's christmas party where he apparently had a run in with a photographer ...


Cummins, who is 5ft 8in, claims the 6ft 3in on-loan Liverpool striker gouged his right eye while trying to grab his camera.
Cummins also claims the former Newcastle star went to BITE him after knocking him to the floor.
The 33-year-old photographer was later admitted to hospital, where he offered a statement to the police which they are now understood to be investigating.
‘He was like a wild animal,’
‘I felt this terrible pain in my eye as he gouged me.
‘I was screaming, “My eyes!” but he kept it up. The pain was incredible.’
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom