• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

UFC

Forgot to say that Khabib vs Ferguson is signed too, looking forward to that. Presume Tony will get beat, but the kid has loads of heart, loads of stamina, and stings you a million times with low power shots. I can't remember him going up against a wrestler though, maybe Johnson years ago? (which he lost) Let alone one of the calibre of Khabib. Should be a good fight though, and he has a decent ground game when he gets put down there.
 
He has a better chance than you think. Ferguson's ground game is plenty formidable.
 
Absolutely, he does have a 'good' ground game, no doubt about that. But, it's better when he's on top, not on his back. He's never spent any time on his back with an elite level wrestler ontop of him. And he's not Damian Maia either. As I said, good fight, looking forward to it, and it's not a shoe-in like the mcgregor fight was but you'd think Khabib is heavy favourite.
 
Bit of an anti-climax that main event considering how well they both did in their previous fights. Fair play to Usman, got the job done and got the finish. He did get an accidental eye poke, but the creepy fucker did not get kicked in the balls.
Do they give Masividal a title shot now? Dana loves him. I'm sure Woodley would like another go.
 
Bit of an anti-climax that main event considering how well they both did in their previous fights. Fair play to Usman, got the job done and got the finish. He did get an accidental eye poke, but the creepy fucker did not get kicked in the balls.
Do they give Masividal a title shot now? Dana loves him. I'm sure Woodley would like another go.
I believe Masividal doesn't want title shot himself, cause no money in that fight, now he is bigger than title.. conor, nick diaz even colby would be more appealing for him I believe, don't you think so?) Usman is to risky for him, maybe after another money fight he can go try to go for a title
 
Masvidal I'm sure love a money fight vs conor, but, conor is tied up - If he beats Cerrone then he's getting another go at Khabib straight away, and if he loses, then he's as good as done.
Diaz is a fair one, but I'm not sure how competitive that would be, and would Dana want to let Diaz headline a ppv, and all that money, straight off a like 5yr break and he's only an average fighter? Not sure.
 
So the UFC is back wkend with a pretty dire card, but with mcgregor and cerrone topping it. Mcgregor hasn't won a fight for 4yrs, and Cerrone has lost 6 won 4 in that time, and lost his last 2 against very good opposition. Cerrone has more wins in the UFC by submission than ko, so he should defo be trying to get mcgregor over as he's got zero ground game to defend. I suspect Cerrone will get get cracked, but it'd be lovely to see him sleep the little prick again.
Will be interesting if at the single press day they do for this (not sure why they've not promoted it), whether any of the press have the balls to ask mcgregor about the 2 sexual assault charges he's got going on that they're doing their very best to cover up.
 
Looks like a reporter tried to press on the rape claims at the presser and got booed by the mcgregor fans and then got shut straight down by dana and even cerrone, so he'll get a free ride on that.

Cerrone is talking like he's just going to try and be all macho and go for a scrap in the middle of the octagon with conor, if he really is that stupid it's going to be a very short night for him, a rnd1 ko. He either needs to shoot and put conor on his arse where he's useless, or destroy his legs.
 
I'm not so sure. The last guy Conor smacked in this weight class got up from it every time. It's possible his power isn't as fatal here, Cowboy just needs to keep getting up, wait until the gas tank is completely empty, and then shoot.

If he shoots too early, he'll take a knee to the face, and definitely won't get up. Or fight again even.
 
I'm no fan of conor, but he has a very good left hand, stand in the middle with him and walk on to that at your own peril. Corrone will go down if he does.
As for taking the knee every time you shoot, Khabib put him on his arse for fun from round 1 and didn't get any damage from any knees.

I just hope Cerrone was talking shit about what he's got planned for tonight else it's going to be a round 1 ko, conor telling everyone he's the greatest ever, and dana giving him an immediate shot at Khabib.
 
It's immaterial now, Cerrone seems to have fucked his foot/ankle, he didn't take off his trackies at the weigh in and walked around like a strange retard probably attempting to hide it.
 
Yeah I'm no expert but it didn't look like Cerrone wanted to fight.
 
As I thought, the spaz got smashed in round 1.
Good luck to Conor, big fight for him next against some proper opposition. If it's the winner of Tony Vs khabib, it's not gonna be for a while yet.
 
Those shoulders understandably took him by surprise, other than not try to shoot in after 3 seconds, there's not a lot he could have done to avoid his face getting fucked to bits.
 
He'll continue to be amazing at them if they keep giving him bums

Khabib fights April, so I can't see this fight happening till late into this year if Khabib decides to give it a go. Wonder if conor will take another fight in the meantime. I'd like to see him fight Usman/Convington/Woodley/Edwards/Lawler/Gaethje as a warm up, but I suspect they'll give him someone else bollocks.
 
Mors, your bias continues to cloud your judgement. Cerrone a bum? He has the most wins in UFC. He is known for a slow start against boxers and as expected got lit up. You questioned Mcgregor's power using Diaz as an example. Diaz is a freak of nature who has a history of walking through punches. Just like he did with Mazvidal. Diaz takes a battering that would TKO other fighters. If the Doctor hadn't stopped the BMF fight then Diaz would have continued to eat punches. He would have lost the fight but he would keep getting back up.

Mcgregor isn't hand picking fights. He fought Poirier and Max Holloway in his younger year. Chad Mendez at short notice. Then Aldo. He cleaned out that division. He then fought the current lightweight champion Eddie Alvarez and beat him. He also fought Khabib. It didn't go well for him but rumours of drinking, bad camp and poor in fight tactics cost him. Plus Khabib is a monster. You could argue picking Cowboy was a soft fight but Mcgregor probably doesn't want to take a 155lbs fight unless it's for the title. He also wants to stay in the 170lbs division to give him the opportunity to fight Mazvidal.

Don't get me wrong Mcgregor has done despicable things but I'm separating the man from the fighter. Same way Mike Tyson was a despicable human being but we can still admire his art form and boxing style.
 
Nate is indeed a freak of a nature. One of the most underrated fighters imo. Kinda like him as a fighter not so much as a person. If only he had a bit more brains....
 
Hang on a second, his ability isn't clouding my judgement, I'm not disputing he's very good, but, he's not really had a proper fight with anyone decent and won. I'll back that up by outlining a list of his main opponents so it doesn't just like I'm making shit up. Please feel free to call me out on any of the below and keep me honest.

Khabib:
Don't really need to say anything here. Got fucking murdered. Said he had an amazing camp, said he was bang on it.

Mayweather:
Did a decent enough job against a way out of his prime Mayweather, never looked like winning, was beaten easily.

Nate1&2:
Nate is fucking terrible with a terrible record, not even a top 10 fighter. One thing he is brilliant at is JJ, and stupidly conor decided to put himself on the ground after getting rocked by piss poor shots (and slaps ffs!) from nate, and then got finished on a fairly even fight. Conor comfortably won the rematch, but again, Nate is hardly even a top 10 fighter, never held a belt.

Aldo:
Splat. 1 shot 1 punch 1 ko. Great shot. Fair play. Douglas beat tyson, tarver beat jones. This doesn't mean douglas and tarver are any good. It means conor was great over the course of one punch and fair play to him.

Mendes:
Mendes was a very limited wrestler, had beaten nobody, had 2 big fights in his life, against Aldo, lost both. Got on the main stage and was a deer in the headlights for a better fighter.

Cerrone:
Cerrone came into the fight having never held a belt, lost his last 2, lost 6 out of his last 10, with the highlight of his career maybe coming a few years back when he won an iffy decision vs Alvarez that many thought he lost. He's been in one title fight in his life vs RDA and lost that. Fucking useless.




So for me, no, he's not proven himself. He's not fought the big names and put on a multi-round beating on any of them. Ala Jon Jones.
 
Nate is indeed a freak of a nature. One of the most underrated fighters imo. Kinda like him as a fighter not so much as a person. If only he had a bit more brains....

Nate is shit, overall. Brilliant at JJ, and a top lad outside of fighting. But in the octagon, absolute bollocks.
Fought Rory - lost
Fought Masvidal - lost
Fought conor - lost
Fought RDA - lost
Fought bendo - lost
 
He did upset Conor though. And the loss in the rematch was a very close call. And both fights were against an arguably peak Conor. No easy feats.
 
Hang on a second, his ability isn't clouding my judgement, I'm not disputing he's very good, but, he's not really had a proper fight with anyone decent and won. I'll back that up by outlining a list of his main opponents so it doesn't just like I'm making shit up. Please feel free to call me out on any of the below and keep me honest.

Khabib:
Don't really need to say anything here. Got fucking murdered. Said he had an amazing camp, said he was bang on it.

Mayweather:
Did a decent enough job against a way out of his prime Mayweather, never looked like winning, was beaten easily.

Nate1&2:
Nate is fucking terrible with a terrible record, not even a top 10 fighter. One thing he is brilliant at is JJ, and stupidly conor decided to put himself on the ground after getting rocked by piss poor shots (and slaps ffs!) from nate, and then got finished on a fairly even fight. Conor comfortably won the rematch, but again, Nate is hardly even a top 10 fighter, never held a belt.

Aldo:
Splat. 1 shot 1 punch 1 ko. Great shot. Fair play. Douglas beat tyson, tarver beat jones. This doesn't mean douglas and tarver are any good. It means conor was great over the course of one punch and fair play to him.

Mendes:
Mendes was a very limited wrestler, had beaten nobody, had 2 big fights in his life, against Aldo, lost both. Got on the main stage and was a deer in the headlights for a better fighter.

Cerrone:
Cerrone came into the fight having never held a belt, lost his last 2, lost 6 out of his last 10, with the highlight of his career maybe coming a few years back when he won an iffy decision vs Alvarez that many thought he lost. He's been in one title fight in his life vs RDA and lost that. Fucking useless.




So for me, no, he's not proven himself. He's not fought the big names and put on a multi-round beating on any of them. Ala Jon Jones.

You really put Mayweather in your list of bums?
 
Dantes have you been on his whiskey? Read 'main opponents'. Please feel free to add any other main opponents I missed that he's faced. And stop drinking.
 
Thanks

Alvarez:
Fought Alvarez who had lost to Cerrone 3 fights earlier and lost(!). Alvarez had held the belt for precisely one fight, and conor was his first defence, and rolled straight over, handed it over and has never been near a belt in the 5 fights since (lost 3 of those).

He's just not fighting top level opposition, and putting a good beating on them.

I can't stand Jon Jones, but look who he's fought and put a proper beating on:

Shogun
Rampage
Machida
Rashad
Belfort (both of them on the gear at the time)
Gus
Chael
Cormierx2


And then my all time favourite Fedor has been through:

Babalu
Schilt
Big Nogx3
Coleman
Randleman
CroCop
Arlovski
Mir
Chael
Rampage
 
Hang on a second, his ability isn't clouding my judgement, I'm not disputing he's very good, but, he's not really had a proper fight with anyone decent and won. I'll back that up by outlining a list of his main opponents so it doesn't just like I'm making shit up. Please feel free to call me out on any of the below and keep me honest.

Khabib:
Don't really need to say anything here. Got fucking murdered. Said he had an amazing camp, said he was bang on it.

Mayweather:
Did a decent enough job against a way out of his prime Mayweather, never looked like winning, was beaten easily.

Nate1&2:
Nate is fucking terrible with a terrible record, not even a top 10 fighter. One thing he is brilliant at is JJ, and stupidly conor decided to put himself on the ground after getting rocked by piss poor shots (and slaps ffs!) from nate, and then got finished on a fairly even fight. Conor comfortably won the rematch, but again, Nate is hardly even a top 10 fighter, never held a belt.

Aldo:
Splat. 1 shot 1 punch 1 ko. Great shot. Fair play. Douglas beat tyson, tarver beat jones. This doesn't mean douglas and tarver are any good. It means conor was great over the course of one punch and fair play to him.

Mendes:
Mendes was a very limited wrestler, had beaten nobody, had 2 big fights in his life, against Aldo, lost both. Got on the main stage and was a deer in the headlights for a better fighter.

Cerrone:
Cerrone came into the fight having never held a belt, lost his last 2, lost 6 out of his last 10, with the highlight of his career maybe coming a few years back when he won an iffy decision vs Alvarez that many thought he lost. He's been in one title fight in his life vs RDA and lost that. Fucking useless.




So for me, no, he's not proven himself. He's not fought the big names and put on a multi-round beating on any of them. Ala Jon Jones.

So he did beat Aldo when Aldo was the best around.
One punch or not he beat him, the fact he knocked him out when nobody else could speaks for itself.

Your bias is laughable.
 
I've explained my thinking dreamy, as did ILD (we disagree but can at least explain our thinking), you seem the to be one of these conor nuthuggers that swans in and professes he's the greatest ever, when you don't even watch the sport, don't watch the other fighters, and have started watching in in the last 6months, when others have been watching it from when Royce was fighting 3 times a night.

I am not saying conor is shit, far from it, he's a very good striker. But he's untested unlike the true greats of the sport. He attracts people like you to the sport because of his elite level shit talking.

As for his win vs Also, again, buster douglas caught mike tyson when he was the greatest, does that therefore make him better does it. He caught him, fair play, good on him, good win. Muhammed Ali lost 5 fights in his life, everyone that beat him was better than him by your logic I presume.
 
I've explained my thinking dreamy, as did ILD (we disagree but can at least explain our thinking), you seem the to be one of these conor nuthuggers that swans in and professes he's the greatest ever, when you don't even watch the sport, don't watch the other fighters, and have started watching in in the last 6months, when others have been watching it from when Royce was fighting 3 times a night.

I am not saying conor is shit, far from it, he's a very good striker. But he's untested unlike the true greats of the sport. He attracts people like you to the sport because of his elite level shit talking.

As for his win vs Also, again, buster douglas caught mike tyson when he was the greatest, does that therefore make him better does it. He caught him, fair play, good on him, good win. Muhammed Ali lost 5 fights in his life, everyone that beat him was better than him by your logic I presume.

It wasn't a Buster Douglas lucky punch though. Buster Douglas was 50/1 underdog for that fight. He lost the title to Hollyfield in his next fight and retired. Mcgregor was 2/1 underdog, he shared his fight prediction before the fight and executed his tactics. He then moved up in weight and won the lightweight title. Not similar to Douglas' lucky punch if you want to call it that.

You can't presume logic Mors. No one is presuming Mcgregor is the best. You keep veering from one extreme to another. Mcgregor beating Aldo doesn't immediately imply he is better but you can't diminish the achievement of knocking out a champion in 13 seconds who was undefeated for nearly a decade.

I do think bias is clouding your judgement.

Mcgregor has nothing to prove in the flyweight division. A rematch with Max or Aldo perhaps but he has beaten both. He has no interest in cutting that weight again anyway.

So we look at the 155lb division. He's already beaten DP at flyweight (a different fighter now I'll add) so where is the motivation to fight him now, even at 155? Gaethe probably is the only other ranked fighter worth fighting. Fans would tune in. I think Mcgregor beats him but it doesn't do much for Mcgregors ranking. He's already ranked ahead of him. Conor vs Tony would be amazing from start to finish. Tony is probably my favourite fighter. I'd like to also see Conor fight Khabib with different tactics, if that's even possible vs that monster.

That leave 170lbs division. Mazvidal is the obvious fight or Diaz 3. Fans would sign up for both.
 
Last edited:
Hang on a second, his ability isn't clouding my judgement, I'm not disputing he's very good, but, he's not really had a proper fight with anyone decent and won. I'll back that up by outlining a list of his main opponents so it doesn't just like I'm making shit up. Please feel free to call me out on any of the below and keep me honest.

Khabib:
Don't really need to say anything here. Got fucking murdered. Said he had an amazing camp, said he was bang on it.

Mayweather:
Did a decent enough job against a way out of his prime Mayweather, never looked like winning, was beaten easily.

Nate1&2:
Nate is fucking terrible with a terrible record, not even a top 10 fighter. One thing he is brilliant at is JJ, and stupidly conor decided to put himself on the ground after getting rocked by piss poor shots (and slaps ffs!) from nate, and then got finished on a fairly even fight. Conor comfortably won the rematch, but again, Nate is hardly even a top 10 fighter, never held a belt.

Aldo:
Splat. 1 shot 1 punch 1 ko. Great shot. Fair play. Douglas beat tyson, tarver beat jones. This doesn't mean douglas and tarver are any good. It means conor was great over the course of one punch and fair play to him.

Mendes:
Mendes was a very limited wrestler, had beaten nobody, had 2 big fights in his life, against Aldo, lost both. Got on the main stage and was a deer in the headlights for a better fighter.

Cerrone:
Cerrone came into the fight having never held a belt, lost his last 2, lost 6 out of his last 10, with the highlight of his career maybe coming a few years back when he won an iffy decision vs Alvarez that many thought he lost. He's been in one title fight in his life vs RDA and lost that. Fucking useless.

So for me, no, he's not proven himself. He's not fought the big names and put on a multi-round beating on any of them. Ala Jon Jones.

Only seeing this now, apologies. I can't agree.

At lightweight he's fought and beaten Max, DP, Mendez and Aldo. Max and Aldo both considered to be two of the best flyweights ever. He beat DP within a minute or two.

Lightweight - Beats current champ who had been known for violent and aggressive fights.

Fights Diaz 2. Two wars. Loved both fights from a fan perspective.

Khabib - Poor tactics. Beaten soundly. Only fighter to ever take a round of Khabib.

Cowboy - Most wins in history. Can't be called a bum.

Mayweather does not count as it's a different discipline. Mcgregor never had a chance really.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.
 
Only seeing this now, apologies. I can't agree.

At lightweight he's fought and beaten Max, DP, Mendez and Aldo. Max and Aldo both considered to be two of the best flyweights ever. He beat DP within a minute or two.

Lightweight - Beats current champ who had been known for violent and aggressive fights.

Fights Diaz 2. Two wars. Loved both fights from a fan perspective.

Khabib - Poor tactics. Beaten soundly. Only fighter to ever take a round of Khabib.

Cowboy - Most wins in history. Can't be called a bum.

Mayweather does not count as it's a different discipline. Mcgregor never had a chance really.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

Re Aldo. He beat Aldo with a lucky although planned punch. Every fighter plans to punch the other fighter in every single fight, and probably works on dozens of setups, when one comes up they can't claim to be a clairvoyant. But, a good win never the less. Re-run that exact fight 10 times, and I wouldn't expect 10 wins for conor, nor would I expect 10 wins for douglas vs tyson.
Re Max, he beat Max 7rs ago when Max had had about 6 professional fights. This is like when beating someone in the amateurs. Also, I'm not sure why we'd class Max as one of the greatest? He beat Aldo twice after conor did, and that's about it? Just been beaten by Volkanovski and Porier?

Diaz - 2 fights that people liked, doesn't distract from Diaz being rubbish.

Khabib - Murdered.

Cowboy absolutely is a bum. Beat no one, won nothing. Fights every 3wks because he loves it, fair play to him. Kimbo also loved having a scrap after 30mins.

In my opinion, until he fights some great fighters for longer than 13seconds (which he hasn't so far, he might in the future) then he's untested and unproven against the elite. He's fought 2 elite fighters, beat one and then got mauled by the other. Everyone else he's fought has padded his record.
 
Back
Top Bottom